This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 37/12/2984    most recent 01.STR.0000248758.32627.3bv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ramsey, D. J. C. Articles by Kalra, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ramsey, D. J. C. Articles by Kalra, L. Related Collections Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2006;37:2984.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Can Pulse Oximetry or a Bedside Swallowing Assessment Be Used to Detect Aspiration After Stroke?

From the Department of Stroke Medicine (D.J.C.R., L.K.), King’s College London School of Medicine, London, and the Health Care of Older People Department (D.J.C.R., D.G.S.), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, Kent, England.

Correspondence to Dr D.J.C. Ramsey, Department of Stroke Medicine, King’s College London School of Medicine, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ UK. E-mail deborah.ramsey{at}kcl.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Desaturation during swallowing may help to identify aspiration in stroke patients. This study investigated pulse oximetry, bedside swallowing assessment (BSA), and videofluoroscopy as tests for detecting aspiration after stroke.

Methods— Swallowing was assessed in 189 stroke patients (mean±SD age, 70.9±12.3 years) within 5 days of symptom onset with a modified BSA (water replaced by radio-opaque contrast agent, followed by chest radiography to detect aspiration). Simultaneous pulse oximetry recorded the greatest desaturation from baseline for 10 minutes from modified BSA onset. Videofluoroscopy was undertaken in 54 (28%) patients.

Results— Modified BSA showed a safe swallow in 98 (51.9%), unsafe swallow in 85 (45.0%), and silent aspiration in 6 (3.2%) patients. During swallowing, desaturation by >2% occurred in 27 (27.6%) and by >5% in 3 (3.1%) of the 98 safe-swallow patients on modified BSA. Of the 85 unsafe-swallow patients, only 28 (32.9%) desaturated by >2% and 6 (7.1%) by >5%. Desaturation did not occur in any of the 6 silent aspirators. With the modified BSA to detect aspiration, sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 0.31 and 0.72 for desaturation >2% and 0.07 and 0.97 for desaturation >5%. By videofluoroscopy, sensitivity and specificity for detecting aspiration were 0.47 and 0.72 for modified BSA, 0.33 and 0.62 for desaturation >2%, and 0.13 and 0.95 for desaturation >5%. Combining a failed modified BSA with desaturation >2% or >5% did not significantly improve predictive values.

Conclusions— Modified BSA and pulse oximetry during swallowing, whether alone or in combination, showed inadequate sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for detection of aspiration compared with videofluoroscopy in stroke patients.

Key Words: acute stroke • aspiration • dysphagia • pulse oximetry • stroke management

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Other articles noted Evid. Based Med., June 1, 2007; 12(3): 95 - 96. [Full Text] [PDF]