This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 37/12/3043    most recent 01.STR.0000249427.74970.15v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moss, A. Articles by Nicholas, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moss, A. Articles by Nicholas, M. Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Behavioral/psychosocial - treatment Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke Other Treatment Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2006;37:3043.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Progress Review

Language Rehabilitation in Chronic Aphasia and Time Postonset

A Review of Single-Subject Data

From the MGH Institute of Health Professions, Graduate Program in Communication Sciences and Disorders, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Aviva Moss MS, CCC-SLP. E-mail Aviva.moss{at}alum.dartmouth.org

Background and Purpose— This article is a comprehensive review of aphasia treatment studies for the purpose of investigating the relationship between time postonset of aphasia and response to treatment for aphasia in chronic patients at 1 year after symptom onset.

Methods— Studies that demonstrated treatment response (defined as a measurable change in task performance compared with a control task performance) through the use of single-subject design methodologies on measures of verbal output or auditory comprehension were selected. Individual subject data were extracted from the 23 studies that met criteria identifying the subjects as those who received direct continuous therapy for spoken language deficits and whose changes in response to therapy were measurable. Percent of maximum possible change was used as a measurement of outcome.

Results— Nonparametric correlation statistics (Spearman ) and comparisons of group means (Kruskal–Wallis) were used to compare the relationship between time postonset and improvement. Time postonset at which treatment was initiated did not correlate with response to treatment. No significant differences in response to treatment were found between groups of patients according to times postonset.

Conclusions— Time postonset is not related to response to treatment for aphasia in patients >1 year postonset of aphasia.

Key Words: aphasia • rehabilitation • speech disorders • speech therapy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M.D. Archibald, J. B. Orange, and D. J. Jamieson Implementation of computer-based language therapy in aphasia Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 299 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]