This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 37/3/800    most recent 01.STR.0000202589.47401.c6v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Staub, D. Articles by Frauchiger, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Staub, D. Articles by Frauchiger, B. Related Collections Risk Factors Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2006;37:800.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Prediction of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

Comparison of the Internal Carotid Artery Resistive Index With the Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness

Daniel Staub, MD; Alessandro Meyerhans, MD; Beat Bundi, MD; Hans Peter Schmid, MD Beat Frauchiger, MD

From the Department of Internal Medicine (D.S., A.M., B.B., H.P.S., B.F.), Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeld, Switzerland; and Department of Internal Medicine (D.S.), Division of Angiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

Correspondence to Dr Beat Frauchiger, Head of Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, CH-8500 Frauenfeld, Switzerland. E-mail beat.frauchiger{at}stgag.ch

Background and Purpose— The intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery (CCA) is well correlated with the degree of arteriosclerosis and is a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The (hemodynamic) resistive index (RI) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) correlates with the degree of arteriosclerosis just as well as IMT. The aim of the study was to compare the predictive values of RI and IMT with regard to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Methods— A total of 146 patients with cardiovascular risk factors or established arteriosclerosis were included. Duplex sonography of the CCA and ICA was performed, and the IMT and RI were measured in both vessels. During follow-up for a median of 36 months, the occurrence of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) was assessed.

Results— Thirty-nine cardiovascular events occurred in 28 patients (19.2%). The relative risk for a car-diovascular event per increase of the IMT by 1 SD (0.16 mm) was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.07 to 2.18) and 1.91 (95% CI, 1.34 to 2.73) for RI ICA (0.08). The event rate in patients with IMT <0.79 mm (mean) and RI ICA <0.66 (mean) was 11.8% and 12.7% compared with 25.6% (P=0.03) and 25.0% (P=0.06) in patients with IMT 0.79 mm and RI ICA 0.66, respectively. Log rank analysis showed a continuous increase in the risk of cardiovascular event with increasing range of the IMT (P=0.029) and RI ICA (P<0.001).

Conclusion— The RI ICA is a predictor of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, at least comparable to the well-established IMT.

Key Words: carotid arteries • cardiovascular diseases • prognosis • ultrasonography

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Abbas and F. Corea Surrogate Sonographic Markers of Atherosclerosis Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1644 - 1644. [Full Text] [PDF]