Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2006;37:991-995
Published online before print February 16, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000206282.85610.ae
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/4/991    most recent
01.STR.0000206282.85610.aev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Idbaih, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chabriat, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Idbaih, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chabriat, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Deep Vein Thrombosis
*MRI Scans
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

(Stroke. 2006;37:991.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

MRI of Clot in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis

High Diagnostic Value of Susceptibility-Weighted Images

Ahmed Idbaih, MD; Monique Boukobza, MD; Isabelle Crassard, MD; Raphaël Porcher, PhD; Marie-Germaine Bousser, MD Hugues Chabriat, MD, PhD

From the Department of Neurology (A.I., I.C., M.-G.B., H.C.) and Department of Neuroradiology (M.B.), Hopital Lariboisière, Paris, France; the Department of Biostatistics (R.P.), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.

Correspondence to Hugues Chabriat, Department of Neurology, Hopital Lariboisière, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France. E-mail hugues.chabriat{at}lrb.ap-hop-paris.fr

Background and Purpose— In cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), the sensitivity of conventional MRI sequences to detect clot in the sinuses or veins is incomplete and largely depends on the time elapsed since thrombus formation. Little is known concerning the corresponding diagnostic value of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), echo-planar T2* susceptibility-weighted imaging (T2*SW) or diffusion-weighted images (DWI).

Methods— We performed a retrospective analysis of 114 MRI examinations from 39 patients with CVT using a structured assessment. The time course of sensitivity in the detection of clot (n=166 clots) was analyzed for different MR sequences using a multilevel logistic model. The sensitivity of different MR sequences for diagnosis of cortical venous thrombosis was tested separately (n=38 clots).

Results— The sensitivity of T2*SW and T1-weighted spin echo image (T1SE) sequences to detect clot in the sinuses or veins was estimated at 90% and 71% between day 1 and day 3, which was much higher than that of T2SE, FLAIR or DWI during the first week of clinical onset. The sensitivity of T2*SW was stable in the first week. After this period, the sensitivity of T2*SW decreased less than that of T1SE. Thrombosed cortical veins, even in the absence of visible occlusion on magnetic resonance venography, were detected more frequently with T2*SW (97%) and T1SE (78%) than with FLAIR or DWI (<40%).

Conclusions— T2*SW imaging appears to be of additional diagnostic value in CVT. The T2*SW sequence may be particularly useful during the acute phase of CVT when the sensitivity of the other sequences is incomplete and for the diagnosis of isolated cortical venous thrombosis.


Key Words: cerebral thrombosis • echo planar imaging • magnetic resonance imaging • sensitivity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJ Case ReportsHome page
Y. Katayama, I. Kitajima, H. Niimi, H. Kitahara, and H. Kawai
Diagnosis of cerebral cortical vein thrombosis with T2* weighted magnetic resonance imaging
BMJ Case Reports, September 6, 2009; 2009(sep06_1): bcr0320091651 - bcr0320091651.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Linn, T. Pfefferkorn, K. Ivanicova, S. Muller-Schunk, S. Hartz, M. Wiesmann, M. Dichgans, and H. Bruckmann
Noncontrast CT in Deep Cerebral Venous Thrombosis and Sinus Thrombosis: Comparison of its Diagnostic Value for Both Entities
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 728 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Boukobza, I. Crassard, M.G. Bousser, and H. Chabriat
MR Imaging Features of Isolated Cortical Vein Thrombosis: Diagnosis and Follow-Up
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 344 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Deistung, A. Rauscher, J. Sedlacik, S. Witoszynskyj, and J. R. Reichenbach
Informatics in Radiology: GUIBOLD: A Graphical User Interface for Image Reconstruction and Data Analysis in Susceptibility-weighted MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 639 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]