This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 37/5/1195    most recent 01.STR.0000217331.61083.3bv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Li, Z.-Y. Articles by Gillard, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Li, Z.-Y. Articles by Gillard, J. H. Related Collections Risk Factors Carotid Stenosis Risk Factors for Stroke Carotid endarterectomy

(Stroke. 2006;37:1195.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

How Critical Is Fibrous Cap Thickness to Carotid Plaque Stability?

A Flow–Plaque Interaction Model

Zhi-Yong Li, PhD; Simon P.S. Howarth, MRCS, Eng; Tjun Tang, MRCS Jonathan H. Gillard, FRCR

From the Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Correspondence to Dr Zhi-Yong Li, Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ UK. E-mail ZYL22{at}cam.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Acute cerebral ischemic events are associated with rupture of vulnerable carotid atheroma and subsequent thrombosis. Factors such as luminal stenosis and fibrous cap thickness have been thought to be important risk factors for plaque rupture. We used a flow–structure interaction model to simulate the interaction between blood flow and atheromatous plaque to evaluate the effect of the degree of luminal stenosis and fibrous cap thickness on plaque vulnerability.

Methods— A coupled nonlinear time-dependent model with a flow–plaque interaction simulation was used to perform flow and stress/strain analysis in a stenotic carotid artery model. The stress distribution within the plaque and the flow conditions within the vessel were calculated for every case when varying the fibrous cap thickness from 0.1 to 2 mm and the degree of luminal stenosis from 10% to 95%. A rupture stress of 300 kPa was chosen to indicate a high risk of plaque rupture. A 1-sample t test was used to compare plaque stresses with the rupture stress.

Results— High stress concentrations were found in the plaques in arteries with >70% degree of stenosis. Plaque stresses in arteries with 30% to 70% stenosis increased exponentially as fibrous cap thickness decreased. A decrease of fibrous cap thickness from 0.4 to 0.2 mm resulted in an increase of plaque stress from 141 to 409 kPa in a 40% degree stenotic artery.

Conclusions— There is an increase in plaque stress in arteries with a thin fibrous cap. The presence of a moderate carotid stenosis (30% to 70%) with a thin fibrous cap indicates a high risk for plaque rupture. Patients in the future may be risk stratified by measuring both fibrous cap thickness and luminal stenosis.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • carotid stenosis • rupture • stress • stroke

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. El Khatib, S. Genieys, B. Kazmierczak, and V. Volpert Mathematical modelling of atherosclerosis as an inflammatory disease Phil Trans R Soc A, December 13, 2009; 367(1908): 4877 - 4886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Lee, G. M. Saidel, and M. S. Penn Permeability change of arterial endothelium is an age-dependent function of lesion size in apolipoprotein E-null mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): H2273 - H2279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Beaussier, I. Masson, C. Collin, E. Bozec, B. Laloux, D. Calvet, M. Zidi, P. Boutouyrie, and S. Laurent Carotid Plaque, Arterial Stiffness Gradient, and Remodeling in Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2008; 52(4): 729 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z.-Y. Li and J. H. Gillard Plaque Rupture: Plaque Stress, Shear Stress, and Pressure Drop J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): 1106 - 1107. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hiro, Y. Fukumoto, T. Fujii, and M. Matsuzaki Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): 1107 - 1107. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z.-Y. Li and J. H. Gillard Plaque Rupture: Plaque Stress, Shear Stress, and Pressure Drop J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 5, 2008; 52(6): 499 - 500. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Redgrave, P. Gallagher, J. K. Lovett, and P. M. Rothwell Critical Cap Thickness and Rupture in Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: The Oxford Plaque Study Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1722 - 1729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Karapanayiotides and G. Devuyst Fibrous Cap Thickness and Stability of Carotid Atheromata Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2451 - 2451. [Full Text] [PDF]