| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2006;37:1521.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contribution |
From the Department of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute (P.H.A.H., J.v.G., L.J.K., A.A.), and the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (A.A.), University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; and the Department of Neurology (P.J.K.), Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Correspondence to Ale Algra, MD, Clinical Epidemiologist, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Mailbox STR 6.131, Room STR 7.140, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail A.Algra{at}umcutrecht.nl
Background and Purpose Classification of outcome events is essential in clinical research. The Executive Committee of the European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial (ESPRIT), a secondary prevention trial in patients with cerebral ischemia, repeatedly encountered problems in classifying the cause of death after a stroke if the interval between these events was relatively long. We aimed to develop guidelines for classifying such events.
Methods Twenty-nine neurologists with a special interest in stroke filled out a questionnaire and audited 5 case vignettes. On the basis of this information, we developed a proposal for classifying causes of death after stroke. This proposal was evaluated in an interobserver analysis in which 10 neurologists or residents in neurology assessed 20 of 100 case vignettes.
Results Initially, there was great variation in classifications of the case vignettes, mainly because the correspondents strongly disagreed about the relative importance of the interval between stroke and death, the degree of disability after stroke, the discharge destination (home or institutional care), and the coexistence of infection. In the new proposal, the main criteria were "interval after stroke" (cutoff point at 1 month) and "best Rankin grade after stroke" (cutoff at 3). In the interobserver analysis, good agreement was obtained among the 5 pairs of neurologists who assessed the 20 case vignettes (
0.80 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92).
Conclusions In the absence of guidelines, neurologists show striking variation in the classification of causes of death in patients who die after a stroke. With precise rules, agreement in the classification of death after stroke strongly improved.
Key Words: classification death stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. B. Slot, E. Berge, P. Sandercock, S. C. Lewis, P. Dorman, M. Dennis, and on behalf of the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Proj Causes of Death by Level of Dependency at 6 Months After Ischemic Stroke in 3 Large Cohorts Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1585 - 1589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Goldacre, M. Duncan, M. Griffith, and P. M. Rothwell Mortality Rates for Stroke in England From 1979 to 2004: Trends, Diagnostic Precision, and Artifacts Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2197 - 2203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Prosser, L. MacGregor, K. R. Lees, H.-C. Diener, W. Hacke, S. Davis, and on behalf of the VISTA Investigators Predictors of Early Cardiac Morbidity and Mortality After Ischemic Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2007; 38(8): 2295 - 2302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |