Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2006;37:2381-2384
Published online before print August 3, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000236839.69658.c5
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/9/2381    most recent
01.STR.0000236839.69658.c5v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ariff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Thom, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ariff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Thom, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATENOLOL
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Clinical Studies

(Stroke. 2006;37:2381.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Research Reports

Candesartan- and Atenolol-Based Treatments Induce Different Patterns of Carotid Artery and Left Ventricular Remodeling in Hypertension

Ben Ariff, MRCP; Andrew Zambanini, MRCP; Sarita Vamadeva, MBBS, BSc; Dean Barratt, PhD; Yun Xu, PhD; Peter Sever, PhD, FRCP; Alice Stanton, PhD, FRCPI; Alun Hughes, MB, PhD Simon Thom, MD, FRCP

From the Department of Clinical Pharmacology (B.A., A.Z., S.V., D.B., P.S., A.H., S.T.), International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Division, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, England; the Department of Chemical Engineering (Y.X.), Imperial College, London, England; and the Department of Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics and the RCSI Research Institute (A.S.), Royal College of Surgeon’s in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Correspondence to Dr Ben Ariff, International Centre for Circulatory Health, St. Mary’s Hospital, 59 N Wharf Road, London W2 1LA, UK. E-mail b.ariff{at}imperial.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)–based treatment reduces cardiovascular events and stroke more than does ß-blocker-based treatment despite similar blood pressure (BP) reduction. We investigated whether these treatments have different effects on cardiac and large-artery remodelling and evaluated the relation of arterial remodelling to hemodynamic changes in subjects with hypertension.

Methods— We compared the treatment effects of an ARB (candesartan cilexetil)-based regimen and a ß-blocker (atenolol)–based regimen for 52 weeks on common carotid artery (CCA) and left ventricular structure in hypertensive patients in a randomized, double-blind study. Clinic brachial BP and 24-hour ambulatory BP, carotid BP, left ventricular mass index, CCA intima-media thickness, lumen diameter, intima-media area, and carotid blood flow were measured. Distensibility, circumferential tensile stress, Young’s elastic modulus (Em), and shear stress ({tau}) in the CCA were also calculated.

Results— Both candesartan and atenolol reduced intima-media thickness and intima-media area and increased distensibility to similar extents after 52 weeks of treatment. Despite similar reductions in BP, treatment with atenolol resulted in a lesser reduction in left ventricular mass index, a decrease in lumen diameter, and a reduction in carotid blood flow compared with candesartan.

Conclusions— BP-independent effects of ARB on cardiac and arterial structure may contribute to the beneficial effects of these agents on cardiovascular disease.


Key Words: antihypertensive agents • hypertension • intima-media thickness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. H. Fagard, H. Celis, L. Thijs, and S. Wouters
Regression of Left Ventricular Mass by Antihypertensive Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Comparative Studies
Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): 1084 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Thom, C. Stettler, A. Stanton, N. Witt, R. Tapp, N. Chaturvedi, S. Allemann, J. Mayet, P. Sever, N. Poulter, et al.
Differential Effects of Antihypertensive Treatment on the Retinal Microcirculation: An Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Substudy
Hypertension, August 1, 2009; 54(2): 405 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Laurent, M. Briet, and P. Boutouyrie
Large and Small Artery Cross-Talk and Recent Morbidity-Mortality Trials in Hypertension
Hypertension, August 1, 2009; 54(2): 388 - 392.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ther Adv Cardiovasc DisHome page
K. O. Stumpe, E. Agabiti-Rosei, T. Zielinski, D. Schremmer, J. Scholze, P. Laeis, P. Schwandt, and M. Ludwig
Original Research: Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque volume changes following 2-year angiotensin II-receptor blockade. The Multicentre Olmesartan atherosclerosis Regression Evaluation (MORE) study
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, December 1, 2007; 1(2): 97 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]