| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:111.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney (N.A.L.); the School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney (A.C., A.M.); and the School of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney (R.D.H.), Sydney, Australia.
Correspondence to Natasha A. Lannin, Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Royal Rehabilitation Centre, PO Box 6 Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2112 Australia. E-mail nlannin{at}mail.usyd.edu.au
Background and Purpose— Splints are commonly applied to the wrist and hand to prevent and treat contracture after stroke. However, there have been few randomized trials of this intervention. We sought to determine whether wearing a hand splint, which positions the wrist in either a neutral or an extended position, reduces wrist contracture in adults with hemiplegia after stroke.
Methods— Sixty-three adults who had experienced a stroke within the preceding 8 weeks participated. They were randomized to either a control group (routine therapy) or 1 of 2 intervention groups (routine therapy plus splint in either a neutral or an extended wrist position). Splints were worn overnight for, on average, between 9 and 12 hours, for 4 weeks. The primary outcome, measured by a blinded assessor, was extensibility of the wrist and long finger flexor muscles (angle of wrist extension at a standardized torque).
Results— Neither splint appreciably increased extensibility of the wrist and long finger flexor muscles. After 4 weeks, the effect of neutral wrist splinting was to increase wrist extensibility by a mean of 1.4° (95% CI, –5.4° to 8.2°), and splinting the wrist in extension reduced wrist extensibility by a mean of 1.3° (95% CI, –4.9° to 2.4°) compared with the control condition.
Conclusions— Splinting the wrist in either the neutral or extended wrist position for 4 weeks did not reduce wrist contracture after stroke. These findings suggest that the practice of routine wrist splinting soon after stroke should be discontinued.
Key Words: function pain occupational therapy upper limb disability spasticity
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. F Ross, L. A Harvey, and N. A Lannin Do people with acquired brain impairment benefit from additional therapy specifically directed at the hand? A randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2009; 23(6): 492 - 503. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Marossezky, J. A. Gurka, and I. J. Baguley Splinting Poststroke: the Jury Is Still Out Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): e46 - e46. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lannin, A. McCluskey, R. Herbert, and A. Cusick Response to Letter by Marossezky et al Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): e47 - e47. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Manigandan and J. Charles Effect of Hand Splinting: Isn't Temporality Crucial? Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): e146 - e146. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Herbert, N. Lannin, A. Cusick, and A. McCluskey Response to Letter by Manigandan and Charles Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): e147 - e147. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shah Wrist Splint for Upper Motor Neuron Paralysis Stroke, August 1, 2007; 38(8): e74 - e74. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Herbert, N. A. Lannin, A. McCluskey, and A. Cusick Response to Letter by Shah Stroke, August 1, 2007; 38(8): e75 - e75. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Seneviratne Overnight splinting of the wrist in a neutral or extended position did not prevent contracture after stroke Evid. Based Nurs., July 1, 2007; 10(3): 86 - 86. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |