This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/1/183    most recent 01.STR.0000251795.02560.62v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huttner, H. B. Articles by Bardutzky, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huttner, H. B. Articles by Bardutzky, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Hydrocephalus Related Collections Other Stroke Treatment - Medical Other Stroke Treatment - Surgical Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage

(Stroke. 2007;38:183.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Short Communication

Intracerebral Hemorrhage With Severe Ventricular Involvement

Lumbar Drainage for Communicating Hydrocephalus

Hagen B. Huttner, MD; Simon Nagel, MD; Elena Tognoni; Martin Köhrmann, MD; Eric Jüttler, MD; Berk Orakcioglu, MD; Peter D. Schellinger, MD, PhD; Stefan Schwab, MD Jürgen Bardutzky, MD

From the Department of Neurology (H.B.H., M.K., P.D.S., S.S., J.B.), University of Erlangen, Germany; and the Departments of Neurology (H.B.H., S.N., E.T., E.J.) and Neurosurgery (B.O.), University of Heidelberg, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr H.B. Huttner, Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen, Germany. E-mail Hagen.Huttner{at}neuro.imed.uni-erlangen.de

Background and Purpose— The objective was to analyze the feasibility of a lumbar drainage (LD) for a communicating malresorptive hydrocephalus in patients with supratentorial hemorrhage (intracerebral hemorrhage) accompanied by severe ventricular involvement (intraventricular hemorrhage) who required an external ventricular drain (EVD).

Methods— In this retrospective study, 16 patients received an EVD and concurrent LD and were compared with 39 historical patients treated with EVD alone. The duration of required EVD and need for permanent ventriculoperitoneal-shunt were analyzed.

Results— LD was inserted after 12 (4 to 18) days. In LD-treated patients, the LD was capable to replace repeated EVD exchanges, resulting in a shorter EVD-duration (12 versus 16 days) compared with patients treated with EVD alone. The overall duration of extracorporal cerebrospinal fluid drainage was longer (16 days EVD versus 21 days EVD+LD) and the frequency of ventriculoperitoneal-shunt lower (18.75% versus 33%; P<0.03) in LD-treated patients.

Conclusion— Our data suggest that LD is safe and feasible for treatment of nonpersistent communicating hydrocephalus after intracerebral hemorrhage. After adequate treatment of the occlusive hydrocephalus using an EVD in the acute phase, LD discloses an alternative for further extracorporal cerebrospinal fluid drainage.

Key Words: communicating hydrocephalus • intracerebral hemorrhage • intraventricular hemorrhage • lumbar drainage • therapy • treatment