Published online before print October 22, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496869
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:3063.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Special Report |
Poverty and Stroke in India
A Time to Act
From the Department of Neurology (J.D.P.), Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India; Neurosciences, Department of Medicine (V.S.), Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia; the Stroke Unit (S.J.R.), Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; the Baker Heart Research Institute (A.G.T.), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and the Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine (A.G.T.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Correspondence to Jeyaraj Durai Pandian, DM, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston Rd, Brisbane, QLD, Australia 4029. E-mail jeyarajpandian{at}yahoo.co.in
In developed countries, the predominant health problems are those lifestyle-related illnesses associated with increased wealth. In contrast, diseases occurring in developing countries can largely be attributed to poverty, poor healthcare infrastructure, and limited access to care. However, many developing countries such as India have undergone economic and demographic growth in recent years resulting in a transition from diseases caused by poverty toward chronic, noncommunicable, lifestyle-related diseases. Despite this recent rapid economic growth, a large proportion of the Indian population lives in poverty. Although risk factors for stroke in urban Indian populations are similar to developed nations, it is likely that they may be quite different among those afflicted by poverty. Furthermore, treatment options for stroke are fewer in developing countries like India. Well-organized stroke services and emergency transport services are lacking, many treatments are unaffordable, and sociocultural factors may influence access to medical care for many stroke victims. Most stroke centers are currently in the private sector and establishing such centers in the public sector will require enormous capital investment. Given the limited resources available for hospital treatments, it would be logical to place a greater emphasis on effective populationwide interventions to control or reduce exposure to leading stroke risk factors. There also needs to be a concerted effort to ensure access to stroke care programs that are tailored to suit Indian communities and are accessible to the large majority of the population, namely the poor.
Key Words: burden • developing country • India • poverty • stroke
Related Article:
Stroke 2007 38: 2871-2872.