Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:3302-3307
Published online before print October 25, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.485144
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/12/3302    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.485144v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marler, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marler, J. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines
Right arrow Other Stroke

(Stroke. 2007;38:3302.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Special Reports

NINDS Clinical Trials in Stroke

Lessons Learned and Future Directions

John R. Marler, MD

From the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md.

Correspondence to John R. Marler, MD, Associate Director for Clinical Trials, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd, Rm 2216, Rockville, MD 20892. E-mail marlerj{at}ninds.nih.gov

Abstract

Since 1977 the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has sponsored 28 phase 3 trials to evaluate treatments of stroke, which when all completed will have randomized a total of 44 862 patients in the United States and other countries. NINDS stroke clinical trials have been successful in finding beneficial and cost-effective treatments for cerebrovascular disease. Future trials are likely to be larger and have simpler designs which allow for the inclusion of more patients and which collect less data for each patient. In addition, measures of cognitive outcomes, particularly timed tests of executive function, disability scales, and quality-of-life outcomes will become more common. The stroke research community can take pride in the solid base of evidence that has been built over the past 2 decades. If we continue to follow the discoveries of science, continue to create new trial methodology, and increase participation in clinical trials, significant advances in the treatment of cerebrovascular disease will continue.


Key Words: clinical trials • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M.-K. Sun, J. Hongpaisan, and D. L. Alkon
Postischemic PKC activation rescues retrograde and anterograde long-term memory
PNAS, August 25, 2009; 106(34): 14676 - 14680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
W. N. Kernan, C. M. Viscoli, D. DeMarco, B. Mendes, K. Shrauger, J. L. Schindler, J. C. McVeety, A. Sicklick, D. Moalli, P. Greco, et al.
Boosting enrollment in neurology trials with Local Identification and Outreach Networks (LIONs)
Neurology, April 14, 2009; 72(15): 1345 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. C. Leira, A. Ahmed, D. L. Lamb, H. M. Olalde, R. C. Callison, J. C. Torner, H. P. Adams Jr, and for the AIRDOC study Investigators
Extending Acute Trials to Remote Populations: A Pilot Study During Interhospital Helicopter Transfer
Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3): 895 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. G. Merino
Untangling Vascular Cognitive Impairment
Stroke, March 1, 2008; 39(3): 739 - 740.
[Full Text] [PDF]