Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:929-934
Published online before print January 25, 2007, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000257310.08310.0f
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v38,pe154)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/3/929    most recent
01.STR.0000257310.08310.0fv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Vickrey, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Vickrey, B. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
*Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical
Right arrow Carotid endarterectomy
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrow Risk Factors

(Stroke. 2007;38:929.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Suboptimal Control of Atherosclerotic Disease Risk Factors After Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Procedures

Eric M. Cheng, MD, MS; Steve M. Asch, MD, MPH; Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD; Stefanie D. Vassar, MS; Erin L. Jacob, BA; Martin L. Lee, PhD; Donald S. Chang, MD, MPH; Ralph L. Sacco, MD, MS; An-Fu Hsiao, MD, PhD Barbara G. Vickrey, MD, MPH

From the Departments of Neurology (E.M.C., S.D.V., E.L.J., B.G.V.) and Medicine (S.M.A.) and the Division of Cardiology (D.S.C.), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, Calif; VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior (S.M.A., M.L.L.), Sepulveda, Calif; the Departments of Neurology (E.M.C., S.D.V., B.G.V.) and Medicine (S.M.A., R.H.B.), the Division of Cardiology (D.S.C.), and the School of Public Health (R.H.B., M.L.L.), University of California, Los Angeles, Calif; the RAND Health Program (S.M.A., R.H.B., B.G.V.), Santa Monica, Calif; The Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Irvine (A.-F.H.), Irvine, Calif; the Medical Healthcare Group, VA Long Beach Healthcare System (A.-F.H.), Long Beach, Calif; and the Departments of Epidemiology and Neurology (R.L.S.), Columbia University, New York, NY.

Correspondence to Eric M. Cheng, MD, MS, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Department of Neurology, B500, ML 127, Los Angeles, CA 90073. E-mail eric.cheng{at}va.gov

Background and Purpose— Undergoing a carotid endarterectomy, a coronary artery bypass graft, or a percutaneous coronary intervention provides an opportunity to optimize control of blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein.

Methods— Using Veterans Administration databases, we determined whether patients who underwent a carotid endarterectomy (n=252), coronary artery bypass graft (n=486), or percutaneous coronary intervention (n=720) in 2002 to 2003 at 5 Veterans Administration Healthcare Systems had guideline-recommended control of blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein in 12-month periods before and after a vascular procedure. Postprocedure control of risk factors across procedure groups was compared using {chi}2 tests and multivariate logistic regression.

Results— The proportion of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy who had optimal control of both blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein increased from 23% before the procedure to 33% after the procedure (P=0.05) compared with increases from 32% to 43% for coronary artery bypass graft (P=0.001) and from 29% to 45% for percutaneous coronary intervention (P=0.002). Compared with the carotid endarterectomy group, the percutaneous coronary intervention group was more likely to achieve optimal control of blood pressure (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.42 to 2.59) or low-density lipoprotein (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.26) and the coronary artery bypass graft group was more likely to achieve optimal control of blood pressure (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.42 to 2.59). Postprocedure cardiology visits, increase in medication intensity, and greater frequency of outpatient visits were also associated with optimal postprocedure risk factor control.

Conclusions— Although modest improvements in risk factor control were detected, a majority of patients in each vascular procedure group did not achieve optimal risk factor control. More effective risk factor control programs are needed among most vascular procedure patients.


Key Words: cardiac procedures • carotid prevention • secondary prevention