This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/3/967    most recent 01.STR.0000258112.14918.24v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rha, J.-H. Articles by Saver, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rha, J.-H. Articles by Saver, J. L. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Thrombolysis Acute Cerebral Infarction Emergency treatment of Stroke Angiography

(Stroke. 2007;38:967.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

The Impact of Recanalization on Ischemic Stroke Outcome

A Meta-Analysis

From Department of Neurology (J.-H.R.), Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea; Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (J.L.S.), UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif.

Correspondence to Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, Department of Neurology, University of California, UCLA Stroke Center, 1–240, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1769. E-mail jsaver{at}ucla.edu

Background and Purpose— For a biomarker to serve as an auxiliary or surrogate outcome measure, it must be tightly correlated with and causally related to functional clinical outcome. Vessel recanalization is a potential surrogate outcome marker for functional outcome in trials of thrombolytic and mechanical recanalization therapies in acute stroke, but the correlation of recanalization and clinical outcome has not been previously systematically reviewed.

Methods— Through Medline search, we identified and abstracted recanalization and outcome data from all articles published between 1985 and 2002 that assessed vessel recanalization, either spontaneous or therapeutically induced, in acute ischemic stroke.

Results— Fifty-three studies encompassing 2066 patients reported recanalization rates. Recanalization rates categorized according to intervention were: spontaneous (24.1%), intravenous fibrinolytic (46.2%), intra-arterial fibrinolytic (63.2%), combined intravenous–intra-arterial (67.5%), and mechanical (83.6%). Clinical outcome data categorized by success or failure in achieving recanalization was available from 33 articles encompassing 998 patients. Good functional outcomes at 3 months were more frequent in recanalized versus nonrecanalized patients with odds ratio of 4.43 (95% CI, 3.32 to 5.91). Three-month mortality was reduced in recanalized patients (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.35). Rates of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation did not differ between the 2 groups (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.74).

Conclusions— Formal meta-analysis confirms a strong correlation between recanalization and outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Recanalization is strongly associated with improved functional outcomes and reduced mortality. These findings suggest that recanalization is an appropriate biomarker of therapeutic activity in early phase trials of thrombolytic treatment in acute ischemic stroke.

Key Words: outcome • recanalization • stroke

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. T. Whelan, J. D. Cook, C. M. Amlie-Lefond, C. A. Hovinga, A. K. Chan, R. N. Ichord, G. A. deVeber, and P. F. Thall Practical Model-Based Dose Finding in Early-Phase Clinical Trials: Optimizing Tissue Plasminogen Activator Dose for Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in Children Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2627 - 2636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-M. Olivot, M. Mlynash, V. N. Thijs, S. Kemp, M. G. Lansberg, L. Wechsler, G. Schlaug, R. Bammer, M. P. Marks, and G. W. Albers Relationships Between Infarct Growth, Clinical Outcome, and Early Recanalization in Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2257 - 2263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Sacchetti Is It Time to Definitely Abandon Neuroprotection in Acute Ischemic Stroke? Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1659 - 1660. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Hallevi and J. C. Grotta Antiplatelet Therapy and the Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Arch Neurol, May 1, 2008; 65(5): 575 - 576. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Tsivgoulis and A. Alexandrov Ultrasound-Enhanced Thrombolysis: From Bedside to Bench Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1404 - 1405. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. S. Smith, G. Sung, J. Saver, R. Budzik, G. Duckwiler, D. S. Liebeskind, H. L. Lutsep, M. M. Rymer, R. T. Higashida, S. Starkman, et al. Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Final Results of the Multi MERCI Trial Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1205 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gotkine, G. Rosenberg, I. Steiner, E. Stolz, and M. Wunderlich RECANALIZATION AFTER INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS: DOES A RECANALIZATION TIME WINDOW EXIST? Neurology, January 29, 2008; 70(5): 406 - 407. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Kent and P. Mandava Recanalization Rates Can Be Misleading Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): e103 - e103. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.C. Suh, J.K. Kim, C.G. Choi, S.J. Kim, H.W. Pyun, C. Ahn, D.H. Yang, K.S. Lim, J.-G. Leem, K.D. Hahm, et al. Prognostic Factors for Neurologic Outcome after Endovascular Revascularization of Acute Symptomatic Occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1167 - 1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]