This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/4/1286    most recent 01.STR.0000259632.04324.6cv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Winhuisen, L. Articles by Heiss, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Winhuisen, L. Articles by Heiss, W. D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Aphasia Stroke Related Collections Acute Cerebral Infarction Acute Stroke Syndromes Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging PET and SPECT Pathology of Stroke Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2007;38:1286.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

The Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Poststroke Aphasia

A Follow-Up Investigation

Lutz Winhuisen, MD; Alexander Thiel, MD; Birgit Schumacher, MD; Josef Kessler, PhD; Jobst Rudolf, MD; Walter F. Haupt, MD Wolf D. Heiss, MD

From the Department of Neurology (L.W., A.T., B.S., J.R., W.F.H., W.D.H.), University of Cologne; and the Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research (A.T., J.K., W.D.H.), Cologne, Germany.

Correspondence to Lutz Winhuisen, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany. E-mail L.Winhuisen{at}pet.mpin-koeln.mpg.de

Background and Purpose— Recently, a combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and activation positron emission tomography (PET) study showed essential language function of the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in some right-handed acute poststroke aphasics. We reexamined these patients in the chronic phase to test whether the right IFG remained essential for language performance.

Methods— We reexamined 9 male right-handed patients, age 41 to 75 years, with aphasia 8 weeks after left hemispheric stroke. rTMS was performed over the maximum activation within the left and right IFG as defined by ¹⁵[O]water PET to interfere with language function. A positive rTMS effect was defined as increased reaction time latency or error rate in the semantic task relative to no stimulation.

Results— PET activations of the IFG were observed on the left (2 patients) and bilaterally (7). During rTMS interference over the left IFG, all patients had positive TMS effects, indicating that the left IFG remained essential. Stimulation over the right IFG yielded positive rTMS effects in 2 patients with persisting right IFG activation. Two patients with positive rTMS effects over the right side in the initial study did not show these effects at follow-up. Language performance improved in all patients.

Conclusions— Successful regeneration from poststroke aphasia seems to depend more on the integration of available language-related brain regions than on recruiting new brain regions during the rehabilitation process. Restoration of the left hemisphere network seems to be more effective, although in some cases, right hemisphere areas are integrated successfully.

Key Words: aphasia • positron emission tomography • recovery of function • stroke • transcranial magnetic stimulation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. G. Sorensen and W.-D. Heiss Advances in Imaging 2007 Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 276 - 278. [Full Text] [PDF]