This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/4/1384    most recent 01.STR.0000260102.97954.9cv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eriksson, M. Articles by Stegmayr, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Eriksson, M. Articles by Stegmayr, B. Related Collections Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Acute Cerebral Infarction

(Stroke. 2007;38:1384.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Research Reports

Assessment of Functional Outcome in a National Quality Register for Acute Stroke

Can Simple Self-Reported Items Be Transformed Into the Modified Rankin Scale?

From the Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine (M.E., B.S.), Umeå University, Sweden; the Department of Neurology (P.A.), Örebro University Hospital, Sweden; the Department of Neurology (B.N.), Lund University Hospital, Sweden; and the Department of Medicine (A.T.), Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden.

Correspondence to Marie Eriksson, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden. E-mail marie.eriksson{at}medicin.umu.se

Background and Purpose— To enable self-reporting of functional outcome in quality registers, the corresponding questions have to be easy to interpret. In scientific research, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a standard assessment method. Such methods, with an outsider observer, are not feasible to use in quality registers. For several aspects, eg, comparisons between outcome in clinical studies and observational studies, we determined to see whether the functional outcome, as assessed in a quality register, can be transformed into mRS grades.

Methods— The agreement between self-reported functional outcome (including dependency, living situation, mobility, dressing and toileting) and mRS were analyzed using 555 stroke patients registered in Riks-Stroke, the Swedish quality register for acute stroke, during a 5-month period in 4 hospitals. The self-reported outcome and the mRS grades were concurrently assessed by a telephone interview performed by an experienced nurse 3 months after stroke.

Results— A translation using 5 of the questions from Riks-Stroke classified 76% of the patients to the correct mRS grade. The correlation between Riks-Stroke and mRS was 0.821 and Cohen’s (weighted) was 0.853.

Conclusion— The study shows that self-reported functional outcome can be transformed into mRS grades with a high precision, making the translation useful for future comparative purposes in stroke outcome studies.

Key Words: disability evaluation • outcome assessment • registries • stroke outcome

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.W. Pyun, D.C. Suh, J.K. Kim, J.S. Kim, Y.J. Choi, M.-H. Kim, H.R. Yang, Y.M. Jang, M.-S. Ko, E.Y. Cha, et al. Concomitant Multiple Revascularizations in Supra-Aortic Arteries: Short-Term Results in 50 Patients AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 1895 - 1901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]