Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:1946-1948
Published online before print April 26, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.475376
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/1946    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.475376v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Neuroprotectors
Right arrow Carotid endarterectomy
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Stroke. 2007;38:1946.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Research Letters

Has Free Radical Release Across the Brain After Carotid Endarterectomy Traditionally Been Underestimated?

Significance of Reperfusion Hemodynamics

Damian M. Bailey, PhD; Gareth Morris-Stiff, MD, FRCS; Joe M. McCord, PhD Michael H. Lewis, MD, FRCS

From Department of Physiology (D.M.B.), University of Glamorgan, South Wales, UK; Department of Surgery (G.M.-S., M.H.L.), Royal Glamorgan Hospital, South Wales, UK; Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine (J.M.M.), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo.

Correspondence to Professor Damian Miles Bailey, Department of Physiology, University of Glamorgan, South Wales, UK CF37 1DL. E-mail O2radical{at}btinternet.com

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Ischemia-reperfusion is an established paradigm for the induction of neuro-oxidative stress. The present report highlights the limitations associated with the measurement of free radical exchange across the human brain after carotid endarterectomy if reperfusion hemodynamics are not taken into account.

Summary of Report— Only 2 human studies have reported local changes in the arterio-jugular bulb venous concentration difference (a-vdiff) of free radicals during carotid endarterectomy. The authors reported either no change or only a very minor trans-cerebral release during the course of reperfusion, which was unexpected. However, consistent with other surgical models of ischemia-reperfusion, reperfusion would have been expected to increase plasma volume consistent with reflow-hemodilution. This would artifactually dilute the local concentration of free radicals, attenuate the a-vdiff and thus underestimate the "true" magnitude of cerebral free radical release.

Conclusion— After correction for reflow-hemodilution, the cerebral generation of free radicals after carotid endarterectomy is likely to be significantly more pronounced than previously documented in humans.


Key Words: antioxidants • carotid endarterectomy • cerebral blood flow • hemodilution • free radicals