Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:2096-2100
Published online before print May 17, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.475921
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/7/2096    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.475921v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, S. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation

(Stroke. 2007;38:2096.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful

Arlene Schmid, PhD; Pamela W. Duncan, PhD; Stephanie Studenski, MD, MPH; Sue Min Lai, PhD; Lorie Richards, PhD; Subashan Perera, PhD Samuel S. Wu, PhD

From the Department of Occupational Therapy (A.S.), Indiana University School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, and the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind; the Department of Community and Family Medicine (P.W.D.), Doctor of Physical Therapy Division, Duke Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University, Durham, NC; the Division of Geriatric Medicine (S.S.), University of Pittsburgh, and GRECC, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pa; the Theo and Alfred Landon Center on Aging (S.M.L.), University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kan; the Department of Veteran Affairs (L.R.), and the Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, Fla; the Division of Geriatric Medicine (S.P.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; and the Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Center (S.S.W.), Division of Biostatistics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla.

Correspondence to Arlene Schmid, PhD, OTR, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Indiana University, 1140 W Michigan St, CF 311 Indianapolis, IN 46202-5119. E-mail araschmi{at}iupui.edu

Background and Purpose— Gait velocity is a powerful indicator of function and prognosis after stroke. Gait velocity can be stratified into clinically meaningful functional ambulation classes, such as household ambulation (<0.4 m/s), limited community ambulation (0.4 to 0.8 m/s), and full community ambulation (>0.8 m/s). The purpose of the current study was to determine whether changes in velocity-based community ambulation classification were related to clinically meaningful changes in stroke-related function and quality of life.

Methods— In subacute stroke survivors with mild to moderate deficits who participated in a randomized clinical trial of stroke rehabilitation and had a baseline gait velocity of 0.8 m/s or less, we assessed the effect of success versus failure to achieve a transition to the next class on function and quality of life according to domains of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS).

Results— Of 64 eligible participants, 19 were initially household ambulators, and 12 of them (68%) transitioned to limited community ambulation, whereas of 45 initially limited community ambulators, 17 (38%) became full community ambulators. Function and quality-of-life SIS scores after treatment were significantly higher among survivors who achieved a favorable transition compared with those who did not. Among household ambulators, those who transitioned to limited or full community ambulation had significantly better SIS scores in mobility (P=0.0299) and participation (P=0.0277). Among limited community ambulators, those who achieved the transition to full community ambulatory status had significantly better scores in SIS participation (P=0.0085).

Conclusions— A gait velocity gain that results in a transition to a higher class of ambulation results in better function and quality of life, especially for household ambulators. Household ambulators possibly had more severe stroke deficits, reducing the risk of "ceiling" effects in SIS-measured activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. Outcome assessment based on transitions within a mobility classification scheme that is rooted in gait velocity yields potentially meaningful indicators of clinical benefit. Outcomes should be selected that are clinically meaningful for all levels of severity.


Key Words: functional recovery • gait velocity • quality of life • rehabilitation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Wevers, I. van de Port, M. Vermue, G. Mead, and G. Kwakkel
Effects of Task-Oriented Circuit Class Training on Walking Competency After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2450 - 2459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
H. J. A. van Hedel
Gait Speed in Relation to Categories of Functional Ambulation After Spinal Cord Injury
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 343 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
R. Dickstein
Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 649 - 660.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. G. Bowden, C. K. Balasubramanian, A. L. Behrman, and S. A. Kautz
Validation of a Speed-Based Classification System Using Quantitative Measures of Walking Performance Poststroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 672 - 675.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. H. Buurke, A. V. Nene, G. Kwakkel, V. Erren-Wolters, M. J. IJzerman, and H. J. Hermens
Recovery of Gait After Stroke: What Changes?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 676 - 683.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Lord and L. Rochester
Gait Velocity and Community Ambulation: the Limits of Assessment
Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): e75 - e75.
[Full Text] [PDF]