This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 39/10/2720    most recent STROKEAHA.107.506030v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ryttlefors, M. Articles by Molyneux, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ryttlefors, M. Articles by Molyneux, A. J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Brain Aneurysm Related Collections Cerebral Aneurysm, AVM, & Subarachnoid hemorrhage Aneurysm, AVM, hematoma

(Stroke. 2008;39:2720.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial of Neurosurgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling

Subgroup Analysis of 278 Elderly Patients

Mats Ryttlefors, MD; Per Enblad, MD, PhD; Richard S.C. Kerr, MD Andrew J. Molyneux, MD

From the Department of Neuroscience, Section for Neurosurgery (M.R., P.E.), Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden; the Nuffield Department of Surgery (R.S.C.K.) and the Neurovascular Research Unit (A.J.M.), Radcliffe Infirmary, University of Oxford, UK.

Correspondence to Mats Ryttlefors, MD, Department of Neuroscience, Section for Neurosurgery, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail Mats.Ryttlefors{at}Neurokir.uu.se

Background and Purpose— It is often thought that elderly patients in particular would benefit from endovascular aneurysm treatment. The aim of this analysis was therefore to compare the efficacy and safety of endovascular coiling (EVT) with neurosurgical clipping (NST) in the subgroup of elderly SAH patients in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT).

Methods— In the ISAT cohort 278 SAH patients, 65 years or older, were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated EVT (n=138) or NST (n=140). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 2 (independent survival) at 1 year after the SAH. The rates of procedural complications and adverse events were also recorded.

Results— 83 of 138 (60.1%) patients allocated EVT were independent compared to 78 of 140 (56.1%) allocated NST (N.S.). 36 of 50 (72.0%) patients with internal carotid and posterior communicating artery aneurysms allocated EVT were independent compared to 26 of 50 (52.0%) allocated NST (P<0.05). 10 of 22 (45.5%) patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms allocated EVT were independent compared to 13 of 15 (86.7%) allocated NST (P<0.05). The epilepsy frequency was 0.7% in the EVT group compared to 12.9% in the NST group (P<0.001).

Conclusions— In good grade elderly SAH patients with small anterior circulation aneurysms, EVT should probably be the favored treatment for ruptured internal carotid and posterior communicating artery aneurysms, whereas elderly patients with ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms appear to benefit from NST. EVT resulted in a lower epilepsy frequency than NST.

Key Words: subarachnoid hemorrhage • intracranial aneurysm • aged • endovascular treatment • neurosurgery • clinical trial

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. K. Wakhloo, M. J. Deleo III, and M. M. Brown Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e305 - e312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]