This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 39/4/1347    most recent STROKEAHA.107.498345v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by van Heuven, A. W. Articles by Rinkel, G. J.E. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Heuven, A. W. Articles by Rinkel, G. J.E. Related Collections Cerebral Aneurysm, AVM, & Subarachnoid hemorrhage

(Stroke. 2008;39:1347.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Research Letters

Validation of a Prognostic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale Derived Directly From the Glasgow Coma Scale

From Department of Neurology (A.W.v.H., S.M.D.M., A.A., G.J.E.R.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Patient Care (A.A.), University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to S.M. Dorhout Mees, Room G03.228, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail s.m.dorhoutmees{at}umcutrecht.nl

Abstract

Background and Purpose— A new Glasgow Coma Scale-based scale has been developed to predict patient outcome in subarachnoid hemorrhage by calculating cut-off points by which 2 consecutive categories corresponded to a statistically significant different outcome. We assessed the external validity of this Prognosis on Admission of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (PAASH) scale and compared it to the commonly used World Federation of Neurological Surgeons scale.

Methods— From our database of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients we retrieved data on all patients admitted between November 2000 and March 2006. By means of logistic regression, we calculated OR with corresponding 95% CI for poor outcome at 3 months for each category in comparison with the lowest category of both scales. Areas under the curve of the corresponding receiver operator characteristic curve were calculated.

Results— We included 537 patients. For the PAASH scale, OR ranged from 3.9 (95% CI, 2.4 to 6.2) to 84 (95% CI, 25 to 287) and increased more evenly than for the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale, with OR ranging from 2.3 (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.1) to 69 (95% CI, 31 to 157). Areas under the curve were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.84) for the PAASH and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.86) for the WFNS scale.

Conclusion— Both PAASH and WFNS scales have a good discriminatory ability for patient prognosis. Because the OR of the PAASH increase more gradually, it is slightly preferable to the WFNS scale.

Key Words: outcome • prognosis • subarachnoid hemorrhage