Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:1482-1486
Published online before print March 6, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.500199
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/5/1482    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.500199v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Healey, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Healey, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID
*WARFARIN
Medline Plus Health Information
*Atrial Fibrillation
*Blood Thinners
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Coumarins
Right arrow Other anticoagulants
Right arrow Platelet function inhibitors
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrowRelated Article

(Stroke. 2008;39:1482.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Risks and Benefits of Oral Anticoagulation Compared With Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation According to Stroke Risk

The Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial With Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE-W)

Jeff S. Healey, MD, MSc; Robert G. Hart, MD; Janice Pogue, MSc; Marc A. Pfeffer, MD, PhD; Stefan H. Hohnloser, MD; Raffaele De Caterina, MD; Greg Flaker, MD; Salim Yusuf, MD, DPhil Stuart J. Connolly, MD

From the Population Health Research Institute (J.S.H., J.P., S.Y., S.J.C.), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; the University of Texas at San Antonio (R.G.H.), San Antonio, Tex; Brigham and Women’s Hospital (M.A.P.), Harvard University, Boston, Mass; J.W. Goethe University (S.H.H.), Frankfurt, Germany; G. D’Annunzio University (R.D.C.), Chieta, Italy; and the University of Missouri (G.F.), Columbia, Mo.

Correspondence to Jeff Healey, McMaster University, 237 Barton St E, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 2X2. E-mail healeyj{at}hhsc.ca

Background and Purpose— In ACTIVE-W, oral anticoagulation (OAC) was more efficacious than combined clopidogrel plus aspirin (C+A) in preventing vascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, because OAC carries important bleeding complications, risk stratification schemes have been devised to identify patients for whom the absolute benefits of OAC exceed its risks.

Methods— Participants were risk-stratified with the widely-used CHADS2 scheme. Treatment-specific rates of stroke and major bleeding were calculated for patients with a CHADS2=1 and compared to those with a CHADS2>1.

Results— Observed stroke rates for those with a CHADS2=1 were 1.25% per year on C+A and 0.43% per year on OAC (RR=2.96, 95% CI: 1.26 to 6.98, P=0.01). Among patients with a CHADS2>1, the stroke rates were 3.15% per year on C+A and 2.01% per year on OAC (RR=1.58, 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.24, P=0.01) (P for interaction between stroke risk category and efficacy of OAC=0.19). The risk of major bleeding during OAC was significantly lower among patients with CHADS2=1 (1.36% per year) compared with CHADS2>1 (2.75% per year) (RR=0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79, P=0.003).

Conclusions— In this clinical trial, patients with a CHADS2=1 had a low risk of stroke, yet still derived a modest (<1% per year) but statistically significant absolute reduction in stroke with OAC and had low rates of major hemorrhage on OAC.


Key Words: atrial fibrillation • stroke • risk stratification • anticoagulation


Related Article:

The Balance Between Stroke Prevention and Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation: A Delicate Balance Revisited
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Stroke 2008 39: 1406-1408. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. E. Singer, Y. Chang, M. C. Fang, L. H. Borowsky, N. K. Pomernacki, N. Udaltsova, and A. S. Go
The Net Clinical Benefit of Warfarin Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
Ann Intern Med, September 1, 2009; 151(5): 297 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. G. Hart and L. A. Pearce
Current Status of Stroke Risk Stratification in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2607 - 2610.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Sourgounis, J. Lipiecki, T. S. Lo, and M. Hamon
Coronary Stents and Chronic Anticoagulation
Circulation, March 31, 2009; 119(12): 1682 - 1688.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Working Group
Comparison of 12 Risk Stratification Schemes to Predict Stroke in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1901 - 1910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Y.H. Lip
The Balance Between Stroke Prevention and Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation: A Delicate Balance Revisited
Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1406 - 1408.
[Full Text] [PDF]