This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 39/6/1844    most recent STROKEAHA.107.499806v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mikulík, R. Articles by Kryza, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mikulík, R. Articles by Kryza, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Emergency Medical Services Stroke Related Collections Emergency treatment of Stroke Risk Factors for Stroke Thrombolysis Other Stroke Treatment - Medical Related Article

(Stroke. 2008;39:1844.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Calling 911 in Response to Stroke

A Nationwide Study Assessing Definitive Individual Behavior

Robert Mikulík, MD, PhD; Laura Bunt, PhD; Daniel Hrdlika; Ladislav Duek, PhD; Daniel Václavík, MD Jií Krza

From the Neurology (R.M.) and Sociology (L.B.) Departments, Masaryk University, St. Anne Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic; CEGEDIM (Institute for Analysis of Medical and Pharmaceutical Information) (D.H., J.K.), Czech Republic; the Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses (L.D.), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and the Neurology Department (D.V.), Ostrava Vitkovice, Czech Republic.

Correspondence to Robert Mikulik, MD, Department of Neurology, Masaryk University, St. Anne University Hospital, Pekarska 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic. E-mail mikulik{at}hotmail.com

Background and Purpose— Stroke treatment is time-dependent, yet no study has systematically examined response to individual stroke symptoms in the general population. This nationwide study identifies which specific factors prompt correct response (calling 911) to stroke.

Methods— Between November and December of 2005, a survey using a 3-stage random-sampling method including area, household, and household member sampling was conducted throughout the Czech Republic. Participants >40 years old were personally interviewed via a structured and standardized questionnaire concerning general knowledge and correct response to stroke as assessed by the Stroke Action Test (STAT). Predictors of scoring >50% on STAT were identified by multiple regression.

Results— A total of 650 households were contacted, yielding 592 interviews (response rate 91%). Mean age was 58±12, 55% women. Sixty-nine percent thought stroke was serious condition, and 57% thought it could be treated. Also 54% correctly named 2 risk factors, and 46% named 2 warning signs. Eighteen percent of respondents scored >50% on STAT. The predictors of such a score were age (for each 10-year increment, OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.7), secondary school education (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.6), knowing that stroke is a serious disease (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.1), and knowing that stroke is treatable (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.2).

Conclusions— Knowledge about stroke in the Czech Republic was fair, yet response to warning signs was poor. Our study is the first to identify that calling 911 was influenced by knowledge that stroke is a serious and treatable disease and not by recognition of symptoms.

Key Words: stroke • emergency medical services • educational campaigns • awareness • thrombolysis

Related Article:

Improving Onset to Needle Time: Knowledge Is Not Enough

Richard I. Lindley
Stroke 2008 39: 1667. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Kleindorfer, J. Khoury, J. P. Broderick, E. Rademacher, D. Woo, M. L. Flaherty, K. Alwell, C. J. Moomaw, A. Schneider, A. Pancioli, et al. Temporal Trends in Public Awareness of Stroke: Warning Signs, Risk Factors, and Treatment Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2502 - 2506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]