This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 39/8/2341    most recent STROKEAHA.107.510644v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, S.-W. Articles by Steinman, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee, S.-W. Articles by Steinman, D. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Carotid Artery Disease Related Collections Risk Factors Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors

(Stroke. 2008;39:2341.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Geometry of the Carotid Bifurcation Predicts Its Exposure to Disturbed Flow

Sang-Wook Lee, PhD; Luca Antiga, PhD; J. David Spence, MD David A. Steinman, PhD

From the Biomedical Simulation Laboratory (S.W.L., D.A.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; the Bioengineering Department (L.A.), Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy; and Stroke Prevention and Atherosclerosis Research Centre (J.D.S.), Robarts Research Institute, London, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr David A. Steinman, University of Toronto, 5 King’s College Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G8. E-mail steinman{at}mie.utoronto.ca

Background and Purpose— That certain vessels might be at so-called geometric risk of atherosclerosis rests on assumptions of wide interindividual variations in disturbed flow and of a direct relationship between disturbed flow and lumen geometry. In testing these often-implicit assumptions, the present study aimed to determine whether investigations of local risk factors in atherosclerosis can indeed rely on surrogate geometric markers of disturbed flow.

Methods— Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed on carotid bifurcation geometries derived from MRI of 25 young adults. Disturbed flow was quantified as the surface area exposed to low and oscillatory shear beyond objectively-defined thresholds. Interindividual variations in disturbed flow were contextualized with respect to effects of uncertainties in imaging and geometric reconstruction. Relationships between disturbed flow and various geometric factors were tested via multiple regression.

Results— Relatively wide variations in disturbed flow were observed among the 50 vessels. Multiple regression revealed a significant (P<0.002) relationship between disturbed flow and both proximal area ratio (β0.5) and bifurcation tortuosity (β–0.4), but not bifurcation angle, planarity, or distal area ratio. These findings were shown to be insensitive to assumptions about the flow conditions and to the choice of disturbed flow indicator and threshold.

Conclusions— Certain geometric features of the young adult carotid bifurcation are robust surrogate markers of its exposure to disturbed flow. It may therefore be reasonable to consider large-scale retrospective or prospective imaging studies of local risk factors for atherosclerosis without the need for time-consuming and expensive flow imaging or CFD studies.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • hemodynamics • imaging • MRI • carotid artery • risk factors