| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2009;40:140.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From Department of Neurology (S.N., E.J., P.R.), University of Heidelberg, Medical School, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.D.S., H.B.H., S.S., M.K.), University of Erlangen, Medical School, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology (M.H., E.J.), University of Heidelberg, Medical School, Germany; Acute Stroke Programme (S.N.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, UK.
Correspondence to Simon Nagel, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail simon.nagel{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de
Background and Purpose— While intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) has been approved for acute stroke therapy within 3 hours, the optimum management of basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is still a matter of debate. We compared intraarterial thrombolysis with the combined bridging approach of intravenous abciximab and intraarterial thrombolysis with rt-PA (bridging therapy) in an observational, longitudinal, monocenter study.
Methods— Between 1998 and 2006, information for 106 patients with acute BAO were prospectively entered into a local database. Patients eligible for treatment received either intraarterial thrombolysis with rt-PA alone (intraarterial thrombolysis) or were treated with intravenous abciximab and intraarterial rt-PA (bridging therapy). Outcome parameters were recanalization of the basilar artery according to Trial in Myocardial Infarction criteria, survival, and reduction of severe disability and death at 3 months. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors for recanalization, survival, and clinical outcome.
Results— Of a total of 106 patients with confirmed BAO, 87 patients underwent subsequent angiography. Among those, 75 patients were identified who received the full treatment protocol. Patients in the bridging group had a better recanalization rate (83.7% vs 62.5%; P=0.03), a higher survival rate (58.1% vs 25%; P=0.01), and a better chance for an outcome with no or only mild to moderate disability (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–3; 34.9% vs 12.5%; P=0.02). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates were comparable in both groups (14% in the bridging group vs 18.8%; P=0.41). Independent predictors for recanalization were age (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91–0.99), atrial fibrillation (OR, 6.53; 95% CI, 1.14–37.49), and bridging therapy (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.02 to 11.18). Independent prognostic factors for outcome were Glasgow coma scale score at presentation (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03–1.45) and the combination of bridging therapy with successful recanalization (OR, 3.744; 95% CI, 1.04–13.43).
Conclusion— Bridging therapy for acute BAO with intravenous abciximab and intraarterial rt-PA appears to be safe and yields higher recanalization and improved survival rates, as well as an overall improved chance for a better outcome.
Key Words: acute stroke abciximab antiplatelet agents emergency medicine interventional neuroradiology neurocritial care stents thrombolysis vertrobrobasilary disease
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Vatankhah, T. Gringel, and H. Stolze Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: Need for an Early Diagnosis in a Devastating Disease Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): e501 - e501. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nagel and M. Kohrmann Response to Letter by Vatankhah et al Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): e502 - e502. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.G. Nogueira, A.J. Yoo, F.S. Buonanno, and J.A. Hirsch Endovascular Approaches to Acute Stroke, Part 2: A Comprehensive Review of Studies and Trials AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2009; 30(5): 859 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |