This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/1/24    most recent STROKEAHA.108.518043v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saka, O. Articles by Wolfe, C. C.D.A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saka, O. Articles by Wolfe, C. C.D.A. Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Other Stroke Treatment - Medical Other Stroke

(Stroke. 2009;40:24.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Cost-Effectiveness of Stroke Unit Care Followed by Early Supported Discharge

Ömer Saka, MD, MSc; Victoria Serra, MSc; Yevgeniy Samyshkin, MSc; Alistair McGuire, PhD Charles C.D.A. Wolfe, PhD

From the Division of Health and Social Care Research (O.S., C.C.D.A.W.), King’s College, London, UK; London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Health and Social Care (V.S., A.M.), London, UK; IMS Health (Y.S.), Health Economics and Outcomes Research, London, UK.

Correspondence to Ömer Saka, MD, MSc, King’s College, London, Division of Health and Social Care Research, 42 Weston Street, Capital House, SE1 3QD, London, UK. E-mail omer.saka{at}kcl.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Stroke places a significant burden on the economy in England and Wales with the overall societal costs estimated at £7 billion per annum. There is evidence that both stroke units (SUs) and early supported discharge (ESD) are effective in treating patients with stroke. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of the combination of these 2 strategies and compares it with the care provided in SU without ESD and in a general medical ward without ESD. The objective of this study was to model the long-term (10 years) cost-effectiveness of SU care followed by ESD.

Methods— The study design was cost-effectiveness modeling. The study took place in SUs in the coverage area of the South London Stroke Register, UK. The modeled population was incident ischemic stroke cases (N=844) observed between 2001 and 2006. SU care followed by ESD was compared with SU care without ESD and general medical ward care without ESD. Main outcome measures were health service and societal costs and cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Results— Using the cost-effectiveness threshold of £30000, as commonly used in the UK, SU care followed by ESD is the cost-effective strategy compared with the other 2 options. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SU care followed by ESD is £10661 compared with the general medical ward without ESD care and £17721 compared with the SU without ESD.

Conclusion— SU care followed by ESD is both an effective and a cost-effective strategy with the main gains in years of life saved.

Key Words: cost • cost-effectiveness • economics • stroke • stroke unit