Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:S136-S138
Published online before print December 8, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533653
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/3_suppl_1/S136    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.533653v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Maldonado, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Maldonado, M. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2009;40:S136.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Rehabilitation

Remodeling the Brain With Behavioral Experience After Stroke

Theresa A. Jones, PhD; Rachel P. Allred, BA, BS; DeAnna L. Adkins, PhD; J. Edward Hsu, MD, PhD; Amber O'Bryant, BA Mónica A. Maldonado, BS

From the Department of Psychology and Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Correspondence to Theresa A. Jones, PhD, Seay Hall, 1 University Station A8000, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. E-mail tj{at}psy.utexas.edu

Background and Purpose— Behavioral experience can drive brain plasticity, but we lack sufficient knowledge to optimize its therapeutic use after stroke.

Methods— We outline recent findings from rodent models of cortical stroke of how experiences interact with postinjury events to influence synaptic connectivity and functional outcome. We focus on upper extremity function.

Results— After unilateral cortical infarcts, behavioral experiences shape neuronal structure and activity in both hemispheres. Experiences that matter include interventions such as skill training and constraint-like therapy as well as unguided behaviors such as learned nonuse and behavioral compensation. Lateralized behaviors have bihemispheric influences. Ischemic injury can alter the sensitivity of remaining neocortical neurons to behavioral change and this can have positive and negative functional effects.

Conclusions— Because experience is ongoing in stroke survivors, a better understanding of its interaction with brain reorganization is needed so that it can be manipulated to improve function and prevent its worsening.


Key Words: learned nonuse • motor cortex • motor rehabilitation • synaptic plasticity