This Article Free upon publication Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/4/1121    most recent STROKEAHA.108.543371v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stuart-Shor, E. M. Articles by Mittleman, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stuart-Shor, E. M. Articles by Mittleman, M. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke Risk Factors Epidemiology

(Stroke. 2009;40:1121.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Go Red for Women

Gender Differences in Presenting and Prodromal Stroke Symptoms

Eileen M. Stuart-Shor, PhD, ANP; Gregory A. Wellenius, ScD; Donna M. DelloIacono, PhD(c), RN Murray A. Mittleman, MD, DrPH

From the Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School (E.M.S., G.A.W., M.A.M.), Boston, Mass; the College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston (E.M.S., D.M.D.); and the Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital (D.M.D.), Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Eileen M. Stuart-Shor, PhD, ANP, Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 375 Longwood Avenue, 4th Floor, Room 423, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail estuarts{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

Background and Purpose— Prompt recognition of stroke symptoms is critical to timely treatment and women have increased delay to treatment. Women may be more likely to present with atypical symptoms, but this hypothesis has not been extensively evaluated.

Methods— We examined gender differences in the prevalence of presenting and prodromal stroke symptoms among 1107 consecutive patients hospitalized with neurologist-confirmed acute ischemic stroke. Patient demographics, clinical variables, and stroke symptoms were abstracted from medical records by trained abstractors using standardized forms. Estimates were age-standardized to the age distribution of men and women combined. Presenting symptoms occurred within 24 hours of incident stroke admission; prodromal symptoms occurred 24 hours of admission.

Results— Women were significantly older (P<0.001), more likely to have cardioembolic stroke (P<0.01), and less likely to receive aspirin (P=0.014) or statins (P<0.001). Thirty-five percent of the sample (n=389) reported prodromal symptoms. Women were more likely to have 1 somatic prodromal and presenting symptoms (P=0.03; P=0.008), but did not differ from men on specific somatic symptoms. Women did not differ from men in classic presenting stroke symptoms (P=0.89).

Conclusion— Women did not differ significantly in the prevalence of traditional stroke symptoms but were more likely to have somatic presenting and prodromal symptoms. We found no differences in specific prodromal symptoms, making it difficult to craft a public health message about gender differences in early warning signs of stroke. These results suggest that the focus of stroke prevention education for women should continue to emphasize traditional stroke risk factors.

Key Words: gender • stroke • symptoms