This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/4/1373    most recent STROKEAHA.108.531228v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ederle, J. Articles by Brown, M. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ederle, J. Articles by Brown, M. M. Related Collections Carotid Stenosis Carotid endarterectomy Angioplasty and Stenting

(Stroke. 2009;40:1373.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Endarterectomy and Endovascular Treatment for Carotid Artery Stenosis

A Cochrane Systematic Review

From the Stroke Research Group, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.

Correspondence to Professor Martin M. Brown, Box 6, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK. E-mail m.brown{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis may be an alternative to surgical endarterectomy. We conducted a systematic review of the randomized evidence to assess the benefits and risks of endovascular treatment compared to surgery.

Methods— Cochrane registers and online databases were searched and researchers in the field contacted. Outcome events were compared using odds ratios (ORs) calculated using the Peto fixed effect and Mantel-Haenszel random effects models if there was significant heterogeneity.

Results— Ten trials involving 3178 patients were included. Not all contributed to each analysis. The primary outcome comparison of any stroke or death within 30 days of treatment favored surgery (fixed-effects OR 1.35), the difference was not statistically significant using the random effects model. Endovascular treatment was significantly better than surgery in avoiding cranial neuropathy (OR 0.15) and myocardial infarction (OR 0.34). There was no significant difference between endovascular treatment and surgery in the following comparisons: 30-day stroke, MI, or death (OR 1.12); 30-day disabling stroke or death (OR 1.19); 30-day death (OR 0.99); 24-month death or stroke (OR 1.26); and 30-day death or stroke in endovascular patients treated with or without protection devices (OR 0.75).

Conclusions— The data are difficult to interpret because the trials are heterogeneous. Five trials were stopped early, perhaps leading to an overestimate of the risks of endovascular treatment. The results do not support a change in clinical practice away from recommending carotid endarterectomy as the treatment of choice for suitable carotid artery stenosis but support continued recruitment in the large ongoing trials.

Key Words: angioplasty • carotid stenosis • endarterectomy • stenting • stroke prevention

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. B. Goldstein The Cart and The Horse: The Advancing Technology of Carotid Artery Stenting Circ Cardiovasc Interv, June 1, 2009; 2(3): 153 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF]