Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:1405-1409
Published online before print February 19, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534107
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/4/1405    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.534107v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amarenco, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amarenco, P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATORVASTATIN
*HEPTANOIC ACID
*PYRROLE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cholesterol
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Transient Ischemic Attacks
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism

(Stroke. 2009;40:1405.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Results of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Trial by Stroke Subtypes

Pierre Amarenco, MD; Oscar Benavente, MD; Larry B. Goldstein, MD; Alfred Callahan, III, MD; Henrik Sillesen, MD, DMSc; Michael G. Hennerici, MD, PhD; Steve Gilbert, PhD; Amy E. Rudolph, PhD; Lisa Simunovic, MS; Justin A. Zivin, MD, PhD; K. Michael A. Welch, MB, ChB, FRCP on behalf of the SPARCL Investigators

From INSERM U-698 and Denis Diderot University (P.A.), Paris, France; the University of Texas Health Science Center (O.B.), San Antonio; Duke University (L.B.G.), Durham, North Carolina; Vanderbilt University (A.C.), Nashville, Tenn; University of Copenhagen (H.S.), Denmark; University of Heidelberg (M.G.H.), Mannheim, Germany; Rho Inc (S.G.), Newton, Mass; Pfizer Inc (A.E.R., L.S.), New York; University of San Diego (J.A.Z.), Calif; and Rosalind Franklin University (K.M.A.W.), Chicago, Ill.

Correspondence to Dr Amarenco, INSERM U-698 and Denis Diderot University-Paris VII, Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Bichat University Hospital, 46, rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France. E-mail pierre.amarenco{at}bch.aphp.fr

Background and Purpose— The SPARCL trial showed that atorvastatin 80 mg/d reduces the risk of stroke and other cardiovascular events in patients with recent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We tested the hypothesis that the benefit of treatment varies according to index event stroke subtype.

Methods— Subjects with stroke or TIA without known coronary heart disease were randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/d or placebo. The SPARCL primary end point was fatal or nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included major cardiovascular events (MCVE; stroke plus major coronary events). Cox regression models testing for an interaction with treatment assignment were used to explore potential differences in efficacy based on stroke subtype.

Results— For subjects randomized to atorvastatin versus placebo, a primary end point occurred in 13.1% versus 18.6% of those classified as having large vessel disease (LVD, 15.8% of 4,731 participants), in 13.1% versus 15.5% of those with small vessel disease (SVD, 29.8%), in 11.2% versus 12.7% of those with ischemic stroke of unknown cause (21.5%), in 7.6% versus 8.8% of those with TIA (30.9%), and in 22.2% versus 8.3% of those with hemorrhagic stroke (HS, 2%) at baseline. There was no difference in the efficacy of treatment for either the primary end point (LVD hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 to 1.02, TIA HR 0.81, CI 0.57 to 1.17, SVD HR 0.85, CI 0.64 to 1.12, unknown cause HR 0.87, CI 0.61 to 1.24, HS HR 3.24, CI 1.01 to 10.4; P for heterogeneity=0.421), or MCVEs (P for heterogeneity=0.360) based on subtype of the index event. As compared to subjects with LVD strokes, those with SVD had similar MCVE rates (19.2% versus 18.5% over the course of the trial), and similar overall reductions in stroke and MCVEs.

Conclusions— Atorvastatin 80 mg/d is similarly efficacious in preventing strokes and other cardiovascular events, irrespective of baseline ischemic stroke subtype.


Key Words: stroke • transient ischemic attack • statins, cholesterol




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. A. Rabinstein
Statins Prevent Stroke Recurrences... But Can They Improve Stroke Outcome?
Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3413 - 3414.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of NeuroInterventional SurgeryHome page
D Fiorella, T N Turan, C P Derdeyn, and M I Chimowitz
Current status of the management of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: the rationale for a randomized trial of medical therapy and intracranial stenting
JNIS, July 3, 2009; (2009) jnis.2009.000125v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]