Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:e366-e379
Published online before print February 26, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.527572
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/5/e366    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.527572v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Brain Aneurysm
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebral Aneurysm, AVM, & Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Right arrow Angiography
Right arrow Aneurysm, AVM, hematoma

(Stroke. 2009;40:e366.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Special Reports

Reporting Standards for Endovascular Repair of Saccular Intracranial Cerebral Aneurysms

Philip M. Meyers, MD; H. Christian Schumacher, MD; Randall T. Higashida, MD; Colin P. Derdeyn, MD; Gary M. Nesbit, MD; David Sacks, MD; Lawrence R. Wechsler, MD; Joshua B. Bederson, MD; Sean D. Lavine, MD Peter Rasmussen, MD

From the Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons (P.M.M., S.D.L.), Neurological Institute of New York, NY; Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Division of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care (H.C.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; University of California (R.T.H.), San Francisco; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (C.P.D.), Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo; Oregon Health and Science University (G.M.N.), Portland, Ore; Advanced Interventional Radiology (D.S.), Reading Hospital and Medical Center, Reading, Pa; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (L.R.W.), Pa; Department of Neurological Surgery (J.B.B.), Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; and Cleveland Clinic Foundation (P.R.), Ohio.

Correspondence to Philip M. Meyers, MD, FAHA, Associate Professor, Radiology and Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Clinical Director, Neuroendovascular Service, New York Presbyterian–Columbia Neurological Institute, New York, NY 10032. E-mail pmm2002{at}columbia.edu

Background and Purpose— The goal of this article is to provide consensus recommendations for reporting standards, terminology, and written definitions when reporting on the radiological evaluation and endovascular treatment of intracranial, cerebral aneurysms. These criteria can be used to design clinical trials, to provide uniformity of definitions for appropriate selection and stratification of patients, and to allow analysis and meta-analysis of reported data.

Methods— This article was written under the auspices of the Joint Writing Group of the Technology Assessment Committee, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society of Interventional Radiology; Joint Section on Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons; and Section of Stroke and Interventional Neurology of the American Academy of Neurology. A computerized search of the National Library of Medicine database of literature (PubMed) from January 1991 to December 2007 was conducted with the goal to identify published endovascular cerebrovascular interventional data about the assessment and endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms useful as benchmarks for quality assessment. We sought to identify those risk adjustment variables that affect the likelihood of success and complications. This article offers the rationale for different clinical and technical considerations that may be important during the design of clinical trials for endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Included in this guidance article are suggestions for uniform reporting standards for such trials. These definitions and standards are primarily intended for research purposes; however, they should also be helpful in clinical practice and applicable to all publications.

Conclusions— The evaluation and treatment of brain aneurysms often involve multiple medical specialties. Recent reviews by the American Heart Association have surveyed the medical literature to develop guidelines for the clinical management of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Despite efforts to synthesize existing knowledge on cerebral aneurysm evaluation and treatment, significant inconsistencies remain in nomenclature and definition for research and reporting purposes. These operational definitions were selected by consensus of a multidisciplinary writing group to provide consistency for reporting on imaging in clinical trials and observational studies involving cerebral aneurysms. These definitions should help different groups to publish results that are directly comparable.


Key Words: aneurysm • aneurysms • methodology • neuroradiology • neurosurgery • reporting standard




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. P. Ferns, M. E.S. Sprengers, W. J. van Rooij, G. J.E. Rinkel, J. C. van Rijn, S. Bipat, M. Sluzewski, and C. B.L.M. Majoie
Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review on Initial Occlusion and Reopening and Retreatment Rates
Stroke, August 1, 2009; 40(8): e523 - e529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]