This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/8/2791    most recent STROKEAHA.109.552323v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Nyffeler, T. Articles by Müri, R. M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nyffeler, T. Articles by Müri, R. M. Related Collections Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation Other Treatment Behavioral Changes and Stroke

(Stroke. 2009;40:2791.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

One Session of Repeated Parietal Theta Burst Stimulation Trains Induces Long-Lasting Improvement of Visual Neglect

Thomas Nyffeler, MD; Dario Cazzoli, MSc; Christian W. Hess, MD René M. Müri, MD

From the Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and Clinical Research, University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Correspondence to René M. Müri, MD, Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University Hospital, University of Berne, Freiburgstrasse 10, 3010 Berne, Switzerland. E-mail rene.mueri{at}insel.ch

Background and Purpose— Visual neglect is a frequent disability in stroke and adversely affects mobility, discharge destination, and length of hospital stay. It is assumed that its severity is enhanced by a released interhemispheric inhibition from the unaffected toward the affected hemisphere. Continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) is a new inhibitory brain stimulation protocol which has the potential to induce behavioral effects outlasting stimulation. We aimed to test whether parietal TBS over the unaffected hemisphere can induce a long-lasting improvement of visual neglect by reducing the interhemispheric inhibition.

Methods— Eleven patients with left-sided visual neglect attributable to right hemispheric stroke were tested in a visual perception task. To evaluate the specificity of the TBS effect, 3 conditions were tested: 2 TBS trains over the left contralesional posterior parietal cortex, 2 trains of sham stimulation over the contralesional posterior parietal cortex, and a control condition without any intervention. To evaluate the lifetime of repeated trains of TBS in 1 session, 4 trains were applied over the contralesional posterior parietal cortex.

Results— Two TBS trains significantly increased the number of perceived left visual targets for up to 8 hours as compared to baseline. No significant improvement was found with sham stimulation or in the control condition without any intervention. The application of 4 TBS trains significantly increased the number of perceived left targets up to 32 hours.

Conclusions— The new approach of repeating TBS at the same day may be promising for therapy of neglect.

Key Words: transcranial magnetic stimulation • neuronal plasticity • recovery of function • stroke • therapy