Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:2893-2898
Published online before print May 28, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.551226
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/8/2893    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.551226v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrocardiology
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction

(Stroke. 2009;40:2893.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Special Report

Cardiac Workup of Ischemic Stroke

Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Yield?

Jane G. Morris, MD; E. Jesus Duffis, MD Marc Fisher, MD

From the Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester.

Correspondence to Jane Morris, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655. E-mail jane.morris{at}umassmemorial.org

Background and Purpose— Discovering potential cardiac sources of stroke is an important part of the urgent evaluation of the ischemic stroke patient as it often impacts treatment decisions that are essential for determining secondary stroke prevention strategies, yet the optimal approach to the cardiac workup of an ischemic stroke patient is not known.

Methods— A review of the literature concerning the utility of cardiac rhythm monitoring (ECG, telemetry, Holter monitors, and event recorders) and structural imaging (transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography) was performed.

Results— Data supporting a definitive, optimal, and cost-effective approach are lacking, though some data suggest that appropriate patient selection can improve the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of rhythm monitoring and echocardiography in the evaluation of stroke etiology.

Conclusions— Based on available data, an algorithmic approach for the evaluation of patients with acute ischemic cerebrovascular events that takes into account therapeutic and diagnostic yield as well as cost-efficiency is proposed.


Key Words: diagnostic method • stroke • echocardiography • electrocardiography