Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:3121-3126
Published online before print June 18, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555979
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/9/3121    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.555979v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belayev, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bazan, N. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belayev, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bazan, N. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrow Neuroprotectors

(Stroke. 2009;40:3121.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Robust Docosahexaenoic Acid–Mediated Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Transient, Focal Cerebral Ischemia

Ludmila Belayev, MD; Larissa Khoutorova, BS; Kristal D. Atkins, MS Nicolas G. Bazan, MD, PhD

From the Neuroscience Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, La.

Correspondence to Ludmila Belayev, MD, Department of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience, LSUHSC Neuroscience Center, 2020 Gravier St, Suite 9B4, Room 946A, New Orleans, LA 70112. E-mail lbelay{at}lsuhsc.edu

Background and Purpose— Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3), an {omega}-3 essential fatty acid family member, is the precursor of neuroprotectin D1, which downregulates apoptosis and, in turn, promotes cell survival. This study was conducted to assess whether DHA would show neuroprotective efficacy when systemically administered in different doses after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) in rats.

Methods— Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and subjected to 2 hour of MCAo. Animals were treated with either DHA (low doses=3.5 or 7 mg/kg; medium doses=16 or 35 mg/kg; and high dose=70 mg/kg) or an equivalent volume of saline intravenously 3 hours after MCAo onset. Neurologic status was evaluated during occlusion (60 minutes) and on days 1, 2, 3, and 7 after MCAo. Seven days after MCAo, brains were perfusion-fixed, and infarct areas and volumes were determined.

Results— Only the low and medium doses of DHA significantly improved the neurologic score compared with vehicle-treated rats at 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days. DHA markedly reduced total corrected infarct volume in all treated groups compared with vehicle-treated rats (3.5 mg/kg, 26±9 mm3; 7 mg/kg, 46±12 mm3; 16 mg/kg, 37±5 mm3; and 35 mg/kg, 34±15 mm3 vs vehicle, 94±12 mm3). Cortical and striatal infarct volumes were also significantly reduced by treatment with DHA. No neuroprotective effects were observed with 70 mg/kg DHA.

Conclusions— We conclude that DHA experimental therapy at low and medium doses improves neurologic and histologic outcomes after focal cerebral ischemia and might provide benefits in patients after ischemic stroke.


Key Words: focal ischemia • lipids • neuroprotection • animal models