Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1977;8:651

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feigenson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feigenson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, S. D.

Stroke, Vol 8, 651-651, Copyright © 1977 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 1. Analysis of 248 unscreened patients-- medical and functional prognostic indicators

JS Feigenson, FH McDowell, P Meese, ML McCarthy and SD Greenberg

A retrospective analysis of 248 patients with stroke (average age 67, range 17-98) admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit over a sixteen month period showed that 80% of these patients were able to return home after an average length of stay (LOS) of 43 days. At discharge 85% of the group were ambulatory and 56% required no help in daily living activities. Severity of weakness on admission, long onset-admission intervals, the presence of severe perceptual or cognitive dysfunction or a homonymous hemianopsia in addition to a motor deficit were related to unfavorable outcome and increased LOS. The age of the patient, dysphasia or a hemisensory deficit in addition to weakness, or diabetes, hypertension, or ASHD were unrelated to the patients' functional status on discharge, discharge disposition, or LOS. Many patients with "unfavorable prognostic signs" made significant improvement after admission and were subsequently discharges. Thus, while the above findings may predict which patients can make maximal gains in a short term treatment facility, they also show that most patients, even those with "poor prognostic signs," can make enough functional improvement to be managed at home after a relatively short hospitalization.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Mackenzie, N. Lincoln, and G. Newby
Capacity to make a decision about discharge destination after stroke: a pilot study
Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2008; 22(12): 1116 - 1126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
N. D Carter and D. T Wade
Delayed discharges from Oxford city hospitals: who and why?
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2002; 16(3): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
A. W. Andrews and R. W. Bohannon
Discharge Function and Length of Stay for Patients with Stroke are Predicted by Lower Extremity Muscle Force on Admission to Rehabilitation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2001; 15(2): 93 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A W. Andrews and R. W Bohannon
Distribution of muscle strength impairments following stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2000; 14(1): 79 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E A Hakim and A M. Bakheit
A study of the factors which influence the length of hospital stay of stroke patients
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1998; 12(2): 151 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
D. Gottlieb, M. Kipnis, E. Sister, V. Medvedev, S. Brill, and Y. Vardi
Classification of Stroke Rehabilitation Patients with a Simple Impairment Scale
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1997; 11(4): 239 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. M. Pedersen, H. S. Jorgensen, H. Nakayama, H. O. Raaschou, and T. S. Olsen
The Impact of Aphasia on ADL and Social Activities After Stroke: The Copenhagen Stroke Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1996; 10(2): 91 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Aging HealthHome page
K. Berg and V. Mor
Medicare Nursing Home Residents with a Stroke: Characteristics and 90-Day Outcomes of Care
J Aging Health, August 1, 1995; 7(3): 384 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Kalra, G. Yu, K. Wilson, and P. Roots
Medical Complications During Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke, June 1, 1995; 26(6): 990 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Mori, S. Sadoshima, S. Ibayashi, M. Fujishima, and K. Iino
Impact of Thalamic Hematoma on Six-Month Mortality and Motor and Cognitive Functional Outcome
Stroke, April 1, 1995; 26(4): 620 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Benbow, C. Watkins, G. Sangster, J. Ellul, and D. Barer
The availability and reliability of information on the premorbid functional status of stroke patients in hospital
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1994; 8(4): 281 - 285.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J E O'Connell and C Gray
Treating hypertension after stroke
BMJ, June 11, 1994; 308(6943): 1523 - 1524.
[Full Text]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Saeki, H. Ogata, T. Okubo, K. Takahashi, and T. Hoshuyama
Impact of factors indicating a poor prognosis on stroke rehabilitation effectiveness
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1993; 7(2): 99 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Shiel and B. Wilson
Performance of stroke patients on the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1992; 6(4): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
D. Gottlieb and D.N. Levine
Unilateral Neglect Influences the Postural Adjustments After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1992; 6(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
F. H. McDowell
Stroke Rehabilitation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1990; 4(4): 187 - 192.
[PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. Stevens
Stroke units
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 1989; 3(3): 235 - 237.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
M. J. Reding and F. H. McDowell
Focused Stroke Rehabilitation Programs Improve Outcome
Arch Neurol, June 1, 1989; 46(6): 700 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
C. Lang, T. Berendes, W. Sauerbrei, P. Bartelsen, and B. Neundorfer
Is Aphasia a Significant Prognostic Factor for the Recovery of Function After Ischemic Stroke Causing Hemiparesis?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1989; 3(4): 177 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
T. S. Olsen
Improvement of Function and Motor Impairment After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1989; 3(4): 187 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
A. W. Heinemann, E. J. Roth, K. Cichowski, and H. B. Betts
Multivariate Analysis of Improvement and Outcome Following Stroke Rehabilitation
Arch Neurol, November 1, 1987; 44(11): 1167 - 1172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. H. Dobkin
Neuromedical Complications in Stroke Patients Transferred for Rehabilitation Before and After Diagnostic Related Groups
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1987; 1(1): 3 - 7.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. R. Yarnell and B. Boutell Friedman
Left "Hemi" ADL Learning and Outcome: Limiting Factors
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1987; 1(3): 125 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. S. Feigenson, W. D. Feigenson, H. S. Gitlow, M. L. McCarthy, and S. D. Greenberg
Outcome and Cost for Stroke Patients in Academic and Community Hospitals: Comparison of Two Groups Referred to a Regional Rehabilitation Center
JAMA, October 20, 1978; 240(17): 1878 - 1880.
[Abstract] [PDF]