Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on April 24, 2008

Stroke. 2008
Published online before print April 24, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490383
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/5/1533    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.490383v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avendano, M.
Right arrow Articles by Glymour, M. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avendano, M.
Right arrow Articles by Glymour, M. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke

Submitted on April 5, 2007
Revised on August 27, 2007
Accepted on September 20, 2007

Stroke Disparities in Older Americans. Is Wealth a More Powerful Indicator of Risk Than Income and Education?

Mauricio Avendano PhD* and M. Maria Glymour ScD

From the Department of Public Health (M.A.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (M.A.), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology (M.M.G.), Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University, New York; the Department of Society, Human Development, and Health (M.M.G.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: m.avendanopabon{at}erasmusmc.nl.

Background and Purpose—This study examines the independent effect of wealth, income, and education on stroke and how these disparities evolve throughout middle and old age in a representative cohort of older Americans.

Methods—Stroke-free participants in the Health and Retirement Study (n=19 565) were followed for an average of 8.5 years. Total wealth, income, and education assessed at baseline were used in Cox proportional hazards models to predict time to stroke. Separate models were estimated for 3 age-strata (50 to 64, 65 to 74, and ≥75), and incorporating risk factor measures (smoking, physical activity, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease).

Results—1542 subjects developed incident stroke. Higher education predicted reduced stroke risk at ages 50 to 64, but not after adjustment for wealth and income. Wealth and income were independent risk factors for stroke at ages 50 to 64. Adjusted hazard ratios comparing the lowest decile with the 75th-90th percentiles were 2.3 (95% CI 1.6, 3.4) for wealth and 1.8 (95% CI 1.3, 2.6) for income. Risk factor adjustment attenuated these effects by 30% to 50%, but coefficients for both wealth (HR=1.7, 95% CI 1.2, 2.5) and income (HR=1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.3) remained significant. Wealth, income, and education did not consistently predict stroke beyond age 65.

Conclusions—Wealth and income are independent predictors of stroke at ages 50 to 64 but do not predict stroke among the elderly. This age patterning might reflect buffering of the negative effect of low socioeconomic status by improved access to social and health care programs at old ages, but may also be an artifact of selective survival.


Key words: socioeconomic factors • education • income • stroke • aged