Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on February 21, 2008

Stroke. 2008
Published online before print February 21, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.497487
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/4/1189    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.497487v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Setacci, C.
Right arrow Articles by de Donato, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Setacci, C.
Right arrow Articles by de Donato, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Angioplasty and Stenting
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Angiography
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

Submitted on July 4, 2007
Accepted on September 7, 2007

Grading Carotid Intrastent Restenosis. A 6-Year Follow-Up Study

Carlo Setacci MD; Emiliano Chisci MD*; Francesco Setacci MD; Francesca Iacoponi PhD; and Gianmarco de Donato MD

From the Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, University of Siena, Italy.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.chisci{at}libero.it.

Background and Purpose—The accuracy of carotid ultrasound has not been well established in predicting intrastent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study is to determine different degrees of ISR using ultrasound velocity criteria compared to percentage of stenosis at angiography.

Methods—This is a 6-year prospective study. After CAS procedure, each patient underwent angiography for measuring ISR (NASCET method) which was compared to peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and the ratio between PSV of internal carotid artery and common carotid artery (ICA/CCA). This was done within 48 hours, thus creating a baseline value. Ultrasound (US) examination was performed at day 30, at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and then yearly. Patients with an increase in PSV greater than 3 times the baseline value or in presence of PSV ≥200 cm/s underwent angiography.

Results—814 CAS procedures, 6427 US examinations, and 1123 angiographies were performed. ISR ≥70% and ISR ≥50% was detected, respectively, in 22 patients and in 73 patients. We defined velocity criteria for grading carotid ISR: PSV ≤104 cm/s, if <30% stenosis; PSV:105 to 174 cm/s if 30% to 50% stenosis; PSV:175 to 299 cm/s if a 50% to 70% stenosis; PSV ≥300 cm/s, EDV ≥140 cm/s, and ICA/CCA ≥3.8 if a ≥70% stenosis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for ISR ≥70% were, respectively, for PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA: 0.99, 0.98, and 0.99.

Conclusions—US grading of carotid ISR can guarantee a correct follow-up after CAS if new customized velocity criteria are validated by skilled operators using a specific protocol of follow-up in a certified laboratory.


Key words: follow-up study • stents • carotid stenosis • ultrasounds • angiography