| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on September 18, 2007
From the Department of Physical Therapy (T.G.H.), University of Illinois at Chicago; the Sensory Motor Performance Program (T.G.H., D.D.C., J.H.K., T.D., J.L.M., H.R.R.), Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Ill; and the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (T.G.H.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tgh{at}uic.edu.
Background and Purpose—Locomotor training (LT) using a treadmill can improve walking ability over conventional rehabilitation in individuals with hemiparesis, although the personnel requirements often necessary to provide LT may limit its application. Robotic devices that provide consistent symmetrical assistance have been developed to facilitate LT, although their effectiveness in improving locomotor ability has not been well established. Methods—Forty-eight ambulatory chronic stroke survivors stratified by severity of locomotor deficits completed a randomized controlled study on the effects of robotic- versus therapist-assisted LT. Both groups received 12 LT sessions for 30 minutes at similar speeds, with guided symmetrical locomotor assistance using a robotic orthosis versus manual facilitation from a single therapist using an assist-as-needed paradigm. Outcome measures included gait speed and symmetry, and clinical measures of activity and participation. Results—Greater improvements in speed and single limb stance time on the impaired leg were observed in subjects who received therapist-assisted LT, with larger speed improvements in those with less severe gait deficits. Perceived rating of the effects of physical limitations on quality of life improved only in subjects with severe gait deficits who received therapist-assisted LT. Conclusions—Therapist-assisted LT facilitates greater improvements in walking ability in ambulatory stroke survivors as compared to a similar dosage of robotic-assisted LT.
Revised on October 17, 2007
Accepted on October 26, 2007
Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke. A Randomized Controlled Study
T. George Hornby PhD, MPT*;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Transformational Technologies in Single-Event Neurological Conditions: Applying Lessons Learned in Stroke to Cerebral Palsy (August 14-15, 2008) Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 747 - 765. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Lewek, T. H. Cruz, J. L. Moore, H. R. Roth, Y. Y. Dhaher, and T. G. Hornby Allowing Intralimb Kinematic Variability During Locomotor Training Poststroke Improves Kinematic Consistency: A Subgroup Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial Physical Therapy, August 1, 2009; 89(8): 829 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H Kahn and T G. Hornby Rapid and Long-term Adaptations in Gait Symmetry Following Unilateral Step Training in People With Hemiparesis Physical Therapy, May 1, 2009; 89(5): 474 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hidler, D. Nichols, M. Pelliccio, K. Brady, D. D. Campbell, J. H. Kahn, and T. G. Hornby Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |