Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on July 17, 2008

Stroke. 2008
Published online before print July 17, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/9/2477    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.513671v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carod-Artal, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Moreira, C. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carod-Artal, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Moreira, C. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

Submitted on December 30, 2007
Revised on February 11, 2008
Accepted on February 15, 2008

The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. Evaluation of Acceptability, Reliability, and Validity of the Brazilian Version

Francisco Javier Carod-Artal MD, PhD*; Luciane Ferreira Coral MD; Daniele Stieven Trizotto MD; and Clarissa Menezes Moreira MD

From the Department of Neurology, Sarah Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Sarah Hospital, Brasilia DF, Brazil.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fjavier4644{at}terra.com.br.

Background and Purpose—We sought to assess the psychometric attributes of the Brazilian version of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0 in stroke survivors.

Methods—Patients were evaluated by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Barthel Index, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, modified Rankin Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Health-related quality of life was evaluated with the MOS–Short Form 36 and SIS 3.0.

Results—One hundred seventy-four stroke survivors were assessed (mean age, 56.9 years; 55.2% male). Hand function had a prominent floor effect (45.9%), whereas a ceiling effect was observed in the communication domain (17.3%). The internal consistency of SIS (Cronbach's {alpha}=0.94) and SIS domains (item-dimension correlation, 0.17 to 0.89) were satisfactory; only the emotion domain had poor internal consistency (Cronbach's {alpha}=0.49). Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 50 consecutive patients. Concerning the stability of the SIS, the weighted {kappa} values ranged from 0.33 (item 3a) to 0.94 (item 7e). Intraclass correlation coefficient values for the SIS domains ranged from 0.48 (emotion) to 0.94 (hand function). Standard error of measurement values for SIS domains ranged from 6.85 (mobility) to 9.63 (social participation). Regarding convergent validity, a significant correlation (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, P<0.0001) was found between the SIS composite physical domain and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (-0.69), modified Rankin Scale (-0.81), Barthel Index (0.87), Lawton Scale (0.76), and MOS–Short Form 36 physical component summary (0.61). SIS domain scores significantly decreased as modified Rankin Scale scores increased (discriminative validity; ANOVA, P<0.0001).

Conclusions—The Brazilian version of SIS 3.0 has satisfactory psychometric properties and can be used in stroke survivors to assess health-related quality of life.


Key words: health-related quality of life • reliability • stroke • Stroke Impact Scale • validity