Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on January 22, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print January 22, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.531236
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/3/880    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.531236v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, J. P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Surgery
Hazardous Substances DB
*LIDOCAINE
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - CV surgery
Right arrow Other diabetes

Submitted on July 9, 2008
Accepted on August 22, 2008

Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo Controlled Study of Neuroprotection With Lidocaine in Cardiac Surgery

Joseph P. Mathew MD*; G. Burkhard Mackensen MD, PhD; Barbara Phillips-Bute PhD; Hilary P. Grocott MD; Donald D. Glower MD; Daniel T. Laskowitz MD; James A. Blumenthal PhD; Mark F. Newman MD; for the Neurologic Outcome Research Group (NORG) of the Duke Heart Center

From the Departments of Anesthesiology (J.P.M., G.B.M., B.P.-B., H.P.G., M.F.N.), Medicine (B.P.-B., D.T.L.), Psychiatry (B.P.-B., J.A.B.), and Surgery (D.D.G.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mathe014{at}mc.duke.edu.

Background and Purpose—Cognitive decline after cardiac surgery remains common and diminishes patients' quality of life. Based on experimental and clinical evidence, this study assessed the potential of intravenously administered lidocaine to reduce postoperative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass.

Methods—After IRB approval, 277 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled clinical trial. Subjects were randomized to receive: (1) Lidocaine as a 1 mg/kg bolus followed by a continuous infusion through 48 hours postoperatively, or (2) Placebo bolus and infusion. Cognitive function was assessed preoperatively and again at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. The effect of lidocaine on postoperative cognition was tested using multivariable regression modeling; P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results—Among the 241 allocated subjects (Lidocaine: n=114; Placebo: n=127), the incidence of cognitive deficit in the lidocaine group was 45.5% versus 45.7% in the placebo group (P=0.97). Multivariable analysis revealed a significant interaction between treatment group and diabetes, such that diabetic subjects receiving lidocaine were more likely to suffer cognitive decline (P=0.004). Secondary analysis identified total lidocaine dose (mg/kg) as a significant predictor of cognitive decline and also revealed a protective effect of lower dose lidocaine in nondiabetic subjects.

Conclusions—Lidocaine administered during and after cardiac surgery does not reduce the high rate of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Higher doses of lidocaine and diabetic status were independent predictors of cognitive decline. Protective effects of lower dose lidocaine in nondiabetic subjects need to be further evaluated.


Key words: lidocaine • cognition • cardiopulmonary bypass