Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on May 21, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print May 21, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540914
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/7/2413    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.540914v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zaro-Weber, O.
Right arrow Articles by Sobesky, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zaro-Weber, O.
Right arrow Articles by Sobesky, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Brain Circulation and Metabolism
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow PET and SPECT

Submitted on October 25, 2008
Revised on March 12, 2009
Accepted on March 16, 2009

The Performance of MRI-Based Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements in Acute and Subacute Stroke Compared With 15O-Water Positron Emission Tomography. Identification of Penumbral Flow

Olivier Zaro-Weber MD; Walter Moeller-Hartmann MD; Wolf-Dieter Heiss MD; and Jan Sobesky MD*

From the Departments of Neurology (O.Z.-W., J.S.) and Diagnostic Radiology (W.M.-H.), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research (W.D.H., J.S., O.Z..-W.), Cologne, Germany; and the Department of Neurology (J.S.), Charite-University Medicine Berlin, Germany.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jan.sobesky{at}charite.de.

Background and Purpose—Perfusion-weighted MRI-based maps of cerebral blood flow (CBFMRI) are considered a good MRI measure of penumbral flow in acute ischemic stroke but are seldom used in clinical routine due to methodical issues. We validated CBFMRI on quantitative CBF measurement by 15O-water positron emission tomography (CBFPET).

Material and Methods—Comparative CBFMRI and CBFPET were performed in patients with acute and subacute stroke. In a voxel-based seed-growing technique, predefined CBFMRI thresholds (<40, <30, <20, <10 mL/100 g/min) were applied and the resulting volumes were compared with the hypoperfusion volume detected by the penumbral threshold (<20 mL/100 g/min) on CBFPET. The volumetric comparison was expressed as the C-ratio (volume CBFMRI/volume CBFPET) to identify the best MRI threshold. The influence of vessel pathology, hypoperfusion size, and time point of imaging was described. The proportion of voxels correctly classified as hypoperfused and the proportion of voxel correctly classified as nonhypoperfused of the best CBFMRI threshold was calculated and a Bland-Altman plot illustrated the method-specific differences.

Results—In 24 patients (median time MRI to PET: 68 minutes; 16 patients imaged within 24 hours after stroke), the median volume of hypoperfusion <20 mL/100 g/min (CBFPET) was 78.5 cm3. Median hypoperfusion volume on CBFMRI ranged from 245.9 cm3 (<40 mL/100 g/min) to 35.5 cm3 (<10 mL/10 g/min). On visual inspection, an excellent qualitative congruence was found. The quantitative congruence was best for the MRI-CBF threshold <20 mL/100 g/min (median C-ratio: 1.0), reaching a proportion of voxels correctly classified as hypoperfused of 76% and a proportion of voxel correctly classified as nonhypoperfused of 96%, but a wide interindividual range (C-ratio 0.3 to 3.5) was found. Ipsilateral vessel pathology, time point of imaging, and size of hypoperfusion did not significantly influence the C-ratio. The Bland-Altman analysis for the volumetric difference of CBFMRI and CBFPET found a good overall agreement but a large SD.

Conclusion—Hypoperfusion areas below the CBFPET penumbral threshold can be well identified by the CBFMRI threshold <20 mL/10 g/min at a group level, but a large individual variance (exceeding 20% of volume in nearly half of the patients) could not be explained. Our results support a prudent use of MRI-based quantitative CBF measurement in clinical routine.


Key words: acute stroke • cerebral blood flow • cerebral ischemia • perfusion weighted magnet resonance imaging • positron emission tomography