Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on June 11, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print June 11, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.547679
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/8/2875    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.547679v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lev, M. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lev, M. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Arterial thrombosis
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Submitted on January 20, 2009
Accepted on April 17, 2009

Avoiding "Pseudo-Reversibility" of CT-CBV Infarct Core Lesions in Acute Stroke Patients After Thrombolytic Therapy. The Need for Algorithmically "Delay-Corrected" CT Perfusion Map Postprocessing Software

Pamela W. Schaefer MD*; Kit Mui MD; Shahmir Kamalian MD; Raul G. Nogueira MD; R. Gilberto Gonzalez MD, PhD; and Michael H. Lev MD

From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pschaefer{at}partners.org.

Background and Purpose—Rarely, acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients have pretreatment CT-CBV abnormalities larger than final infarct volumes. We sought to determine: (1) the prevalence of CT-CBV "reversibility" in AIS patients treated with thrombolytic therapy, and (2) whether the presumed tissue salvage of these CT-CBV lesions depends on the CTP software.

Methods—We reviewed the admission CT-CBV maps (calculated with an algorithm sensitive to tracer arrival time) and follow-up images of 148 AIS patients who received thrombolytic therapy. When the follow-up infarct appeared smaller than the admission CT-CBV lesion, the CTP source images were reprocessed using "delay-correction" software (GE, CTP 4). Original and "delay-corrected" CT-CBV ischemic lesion volumes were compared to each other and follow-up infarct volumes using the Student t test.

Results—11/148 (7.4%) patients had admission CT-CBV larger than follow-up lesions (mean difference -69.5 cc, range -146.0 to -14.0 cc; P<0.05). For all patients, the admission CT-CBV lesions were smaller on the delay- versus nondelay-corrected maps (mean difference -83.1, range -233 to -2 cc; P<0.05). Only 2 patients had delay-corrected CT-CBV lesions larger than follow-up infarctions, with a 12- to 17-cc difference in volume. 7/9 of the remaining patients had extracranial hemodynamic factors potentially delaying tracer arrival, including atrial fibrillation (AF; n=4), congestive heart failure (CHF; n=4), or extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (n=1).

Conclusion—True "reversibility" of CT-CBV "core" lesions in AIS patients after thrombolytic therapy is rare, with small volumes of "salvaged" tissue. Pseudoreversibility of core lesions in standard CT-CBV maps can be avoided by using specific algorithmically optimized delay-correction software. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether this finding applies to algorithms provided by other vendors.


Key words: stroke management • CT perfusion