Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on June 25, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print June 25, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.551812
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/8/2662    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.551812v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maasland, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maasland, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood Thinners
*Stroke
*Transient Ischemic Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Secondary prevention

Submitted on March 6, 2009
Revised on March 29, 2009
Accepted on May 5, 2009

Patients Enrolled in Large Randomized Clinical Trials of Antiplatelet Treatment for Prevention After Transient Ischemic Attack or Ischemic Stroke Are Not Representative of Patients in Clinical Practice. The Netherlands Stroke Survey

Lisette Maasland MD*; Robert J. van Oostenbrugge MD, PhD; Cees F. Franke MD, PhD; Wilma J.M. Scholte op Reimer RN, PhD; Peter J. Koudstaal MD, PhD; Diederik W.J. Dippel MD, PhD; for the Netherlands Stroke Survey Investigators

From the Department of Neurology (L.M., W.J.M.S.o.R., P.J.K., D.W.J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; the Department of Neurology (L.M.), Van Weel-Bethesda Hospital, Dirksland, The Netherlands; the Department of Neurology (R.J.v.O.), University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; and the Department of Neurology (C.F.F.), Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.maasland{at}erasmusmc.nl.

Background and Purpose—Many randomized clinical trials have evaluated the benefit of long-term use of antiplatelet drugs in reducing the risk of new vascular events in patients with a recent transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke. Evidence from these trials forms the basis for national and international guidelines for the management of nearly all such patients in clinical practice. However, abundant and strict enrollment criteria may limit the validity and the applicability of results of randomized clinical trials to clinical practice. We estimated the eligibility for participation in landmark trials of antiplatelet drugs of an unselected group of patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack from a national stroke survey.

Methods—Nine hundred seventy-two patients with transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke were prospectively and consecutively enrolled in the Netherlands Stroke Survey. We applied 7 large antiplatelet trials' enrollment criteria.

Results—In total, 886 patients were discharged alive and available for secondary prevention. Mean follow-up was 2.5 years. The annual rate of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or nonfatal myocardial infarction was 6.7%. The proportions of patients fulfilling the trial enrollment criteria ranged from 25% to 67%. Mortality was significantly higher in ineligible patients (27% to 41%) than in patients fulfilling enrollment criteria (16% to 20%). Rates of vascular events were not higher in trial-eligible patients than in ineligible patients.

Conclusions—Our data confirm that patients with ischemic attack and stroke enrolled in randomized clinical trials are only partially representative of patients in clinical practice. Use of less strict enrollment criteria could enhance "generalizability" and result in more efficient selection of patients for randomized clinical trials.


Key words: antiplatelet drugs • RCT • survey