Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on June 25, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print June 25, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553800
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/9/3127    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.553800v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, M.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, H.-W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, M.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, H.-W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Brain Aneurysm
Related Collections
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage
Right arrow Angiography
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Submitted on March 25, 2009
Revised on May 2, 2009
Accepted on May 20, 2009

Large-Cohort Comparison Between Three-Dimensional Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance and Rotational Digital Subtraction Angiographies in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection

Ming-Hua Li MD, PhD; Ying-Sheng Cheng MD, PhD; Yong-Dong Li MD, PhD*; Chun Fang MD; Shi-Wen Chen MD, PhD; Wu Wang MD; Ding-Jun Hu MD; and Hao-Wen Xu MD

From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: liyongdong2009{at}tom.com.

Background and Purpose—The value of MR angiography varies in diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms due to the difference of equipment and imaging technique. This study was to compare the effectiveness of 3-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T and rotational digital subtraction angiography, both with volume rendering (VR), in detecting intracranial aneurysms.

Methods—One hundred thirty-eight patients with suspected or known aneurysms and other cerebral vascular diseases detected by MR angiography underwent digital subtraction angiography examinations. Postprocessing techniques, including VR and the single artery highlighting method, were performed by a 3-dimensional specialist. The VR-digital subtraction angiography was obtained as the gold standard.

Results—The rotational digital subtraction angiography and VR-digital subtraction angiography revealed 146 aneurysms in 122 patients and no aneurysms in 16 patients. Of the 276 vessels examined, 136 vessels had 146 aneurysms and 140 vessels had none. Per vessel and per aneurysm sensitivities were 100%, whereas the per vessel accuracy ranged from 97.5% to 98.6% and the per aneurysm accuracy ranged from 95.1% to 97.0%.

Conclusions—VR 3-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T has excellent sensitivity, accuracy, and correlation with VR-digital subtraction angiography and is comparable to catheter cerebral angiography for the evaluation of patients with intracranial aneurysms who tolerate MR angiography well.


Key words: digital subtraction angiography • intracranial aneurysm • magnetic resonance angiography • volume rendering