| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on April 24, 2009
From the Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute, and the National Stroke Research Institute (at Austin Health), both in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.abbott{at}nsri.org.au.
Abstract—Significant advances in vascular disease medical intervention since large randomized trials for asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis were conducted (1983–2003) have prompted doubt over current expectations of a surgical benefit. In this systematic review and analysis of published data it was found that rates of ipsilateral and any-territory stroke (+/-TIA), with medical intervention alone, have fallen significantly since the mid-1980s, with recent estimates overlapping those of operated patients in randomized trials. However, current medical intervention alone was estimated at least 3 to 8 times more cost-effective. In conclusion, current vascular disease medical intervention alone is now best for stroke prevention associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis given this new evidence, other cardiovascular benefits, and because high-risk patients who benefit from additional carotid surgery or angioplasty/stenting cannot be identified.
Revised on June 5, 2009
Accepted on July 8, 2009
Medical (Nonsurgical) Intervention Alone Is Now Best for Prevention of Stroke Associated With Asymptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis. Results of a Systematic Review and Analysis
Anne L. Abbott PhD, MBBS, FRACP*
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |