Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on August 20, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print August 20, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.556068
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Stroke: October 2009, Volume 40, Number 10
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/10/e573    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.556068v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbott, A. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abbott, A. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Carotid endarterectomy
Right arrow Angioplasty and Stenting

Submitted on April 24, 2009
Revised on June 5, 2009
Accepted on July 8, 2009

Medical (Nonsurgical) Intervention Alone Is Now Best for Prevention of Stroke Associated With Asymptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis. Results of a Systematic Review and Analysis

Anne L. Abbott PhD, MBBS, FRACP*

From the Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute, and the National Stroke Research Institute (at Austin Health), both in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.abbott{at}nsri.org.au.

Abstract—Significant advances in vascular disease medical intervention since large randomized trials for asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis were conducted (1983–2003) have prompted doubt over current expectations of a surgical benefit. In this systematic review and analysis of published data it was found that rates of ipsilateral and any-territory stroke (+/-TIA), with medical intervention alone, have fallen significantly since the mid-1980s, with recent estimates overlapping those of operated patients in randomized trials. However, current medical intervention alone was estimated at least 3 to 8 times more cost-effective. In conclusion, current vascular disease medical intervention alone is now best for stroke prevention associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis given this new evidence, other cardiovascular benefits, and because high-risk patients who benefit from additional carotid surgery or angioplasty/stenting cannot be identified.


Key words: asymptomatic carotid stenosis • carotid endarterectomy • endovascular treatment • health policy • stroke prevention