Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on September 24, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print September 24, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.559427
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/12/3857    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.559427v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Crocco, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Crocco, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes

Submitted on June 24, 2009
Revised on August 14, 2009
Accepted on August 19, 2009

The Impact of the Extended Parallel Process Model on Stroke Awareness. Pilot Results From a Novel Study

Stephen M. Davis MPA, MSW*; Diana Martinelli PhD; Brian Braxton MD; Kyle Kutrovac MD; and Todd Crocco MD

From the Department of Emergency Medicine (S.M.D., B.B., K.K., T.C.), West Virginia University, Morgantown, WVa; and the P.I. Reed School of Journalism (D.M.), West Virginia University, Morgantown, WVa.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sdavis{at}hsc.wvu.edu.

Background and Purpose—Studies continue to reveal persistent gaps in stroke awareness despite existing stroke messages, especially when the length of time from message exposure increases. Therefore, there is a need to discover messages that promote long-term retention of stroke knowledge. We modified a standard stroke education poster using one health communications model, Extended Parallel Process, to assess its comparative effect on public stroke awareness and information retention.

Methods—This was a single blinded, randomized, pretest, posttest study using 2 age cohorts: younger (18 to 30 years) and older (50+ years). Stroke knowledge was measured by the 28-item Stroke Action Test taken before and after viewing either an Extended Parallel Process modified poster or a standard educational poster in widespread use and again 6 weeks later.

Results—Overall, there were 274 participants (222 younger and 52 older) with 139 randomly assigned to view the Extended Parallel Process poster and 135 assigned to view the standard poster. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the average Stroke Action Test score change between poster groups at all 3 testing intervals, although there was a nonsignificant greater drop in Stroke Action Test scores observed in the control group at the 6-week follow-up (-3.52 versus -2.60; P=0.46). The observed power for this difference was only 11% due to attrition of study participants (total 6-week follow-up, n=170). The younger group did significantly better on the Stroke Action Test from baseline to immediate posttest when viewing either poster (P<0.05).

Conclusions—A common stroke education poster modified according to the Extended Parallel Process model did not significantly increase stroke knowledge compared with a standard control. However, the Extended Parallel Process model may promote long-term stroke knowledge retention, although further studies are needed due to insufficient power from subject attrition.


Key words: acute stroke • cerebrovascular accident • education • educational campaigns • health communication theory • stroke awareness