Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on July 23, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print July 23, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.560045
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/10/3202    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.560045v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schrock, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Losey, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schrock, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Losey, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrocardiology
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical

Submitted on June 9, 2009
Accepted on June 29, 2009

Can the ABCD2 Risk Score Predict Positive Diagnostic Testing for Emergency Department Patients Admitted for Transient Ischemic Attack?

Jon W. Schrock MD*; Aaron Victor BS; and Theodore Losey MD

From the Department of Emergency Medicine (J.W.S.), MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Western Reserve University (A.V.), Cleveland, Ohio; and the Department of Emergency Medicine (T.L.), MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jschrock{at}metrohealth.org.

Background and Purpose—We sought to determine if the ABCD2 score, typically used for risk stratification, could predict having a positive diagnostic test in patients evaluated acutely for transient ischemic attack.

Methods—We performed a retrospective cohort study for patients admitted from our emergency department with a new diagnosis of transient ischemic attack confirmed by a neurologist. ABCD2 scores were calculated and patients with a score of ≥4 were placed in the high-risk cohort. Tests evaluated included electrocardiogram, CT, MRI, MR angiography, carotid ultrasonography, and echocardiography. Specific test findings considered to signify positive diagnostic tests were created a priori.

Results—We identified 256 patients with transient ischemic attack for inclusion; 167 (61%) were female, the median age was 60 years (interquartile range, 50 to 72), and 162 (63%) patients had an ABCD2 score of ≥4. Rates of completion of diagnostic testing were electrocardiogram, 270 (100%); CT, 224 (88%); MRI, 89 (35%); MR angiography, 68 (27%); carotid ultrasonography, 125 (49%); and echocardiography, 135 (53%). Univariate analysis found a significant association only with elevated ABCD2 score and carotid duplex testing (P<0.05).

Conclusion—An elevated ABCD2 score may help predict patients with severe carotid occlusive disease but does not predict positive outcome in other commonly ordered tests for patients being evaluated for transient ischemic attack. An elevated ABCD2 score cannot be recommended as a tool to guide diagnostic testing in patients presenting acutely with transient ischemic attack.


Key words: ABCD2 score • carotid stenosis • stroke • transient ischemic attack