Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 1, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print October 1, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.561365
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/12/3828    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.561365v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, K.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Saver, J. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hong, K.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Saver, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research

Submitted on June 24, 2009
Accepted on July 20, 2009

Quantifying the Value of Stroke Disability Outcomes. WHO Global Burden of Disease Project Disability Weights for Each Level of the Modified Rankin Scale

Keun-Sik Hong MD, PhD and Jeffrey L. Saver MD*

From the Department of Neurology (K.-S.H.), Clinical Research Center, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Goyang, Korea, and Department of Neurology (J.L.S.), UCLA Stroke Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jsaver{at}ucla.edu.

Background and Purpose—The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) categorizes poststroke disability among 7 broad, ordinal grades, but the interval distances between these levels are spaced along the disability spectrum have not been previously investigated.

Methods—We used the person trade-off procedure developed by the World Health Organization Global Burden of Disease Project (WHO-GBDP) to generate disability weights (DWs) ranging from 0 (normal) to 1 (dead) for each of 7 mRS grades. The ratings of an international, 9-member panel of stroke experts were combined by a modified Delphi process.

Results—DWs (95% CI) were 0 for mRS 0, 0.046 (0.004 to 0.088) for mRS 1, 0.212 (0.175 to 0.250) for mRS 2, 0.331 (0.292 to 0.371) for mRS 3, 0.652 (0.625 to 0.678) for mRS 4, 0.944 (0.873 to 1.015) for mRS 5, and 1.0 for mRS 6. DWs of adjacent mRS levels were significantly different (P<0.001 for all). Coefficients of variation showed a high degree of consensus for DWs among panel members. DWs placed each of the 5 intermediate mRS states in different disability class levels of the WHO-GBDP anchor conditions and identified natural clusters to use when reducing the mRS to fewer categories.

Conclusions—Formal DW assignment confirms that the mRS is an ordered but unequally spaced scale. The availability of DWs for each mRS level now permits direct comparison of each poststroke outcome state with the outcomes of hundreds of other diseases in the WHO-GBDP and the expression of stroke burden in different populations by using the uniform metric of disability-adjusted life-years lost.


Key words: disability weight • person trade-off • modified Rankin Scale • stroke outcome