Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 22, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print October 22, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.561985
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/12/3851    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.561985v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asplund, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asplund, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke

Submitted on July 4, 2009
Revised on August 14, 2009
Accepted on September 4, 2009

Patient Dissatisfaction With Acute Stroke Care

Kjell Asplund MD*; Fredrik Jonsson BSc; Marie Eriksson PhD; Birgitta Stegmayr PhD; Peter Appelros MD; Bo Norrving MD; Andreas Terént MD; Kerstin Hulter Åsberg MD; for the Riks-Stroke Collaboration

From Riks-Stroke (K.A., F.J., M.E.), Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden; Epidemiologic Center (B.S.), National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (P.A.), University Hospital. Örebro, Sweden; Department of Neurology (B.N.), University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Medicine (A.T.), Akademiska University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Medicine (K.H.Å.), Enköping Hospital, Enköping, Sweden.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kjell.asplund{at}branneriet.se.

Background and Purpose—Riks-Stroke, the Swedish Stroke Register, was used to explore patient characteristics and stroke services as determinants of patient dissatisfaction with acute in-hospital care.

Methods—All 79 hospitals in Sweden admitting acute stroke patients participate in Riks-Stroke. During 2001 to 2007, 104 876 patients (87% of survivors) responded to a follow-up questionnaire 3 months after acute stroke; this included questions on satisfaction with various aspects of stroke care.

Results—The majority (>90%) were satisfied with acute in-hospital stroke care. Dissatisfaction was closely associated with outcome at 3 months. Patient who were dependent regarding activities of daily living, felt depressed, or had poor self-perceived general health were more likely to be dissatisfied. Dissatisfaction with global acute stroke care was linked to dissatisfaction with other aspects of care, including rehabilitation and support by community services. Patients treated in stroke units were less often dissatisfied than patients in general wards, as were patients who had been treated in a small hospital (vs medium or large hospitals) and patient who had participated in discharge planning. In multivariate analyses, the strongest predictor of dissatisfaction with acute care was poor outcome (dependency regarding activities of daily living, depressed mood, poor self-perceived health).

Conclusions—Dissatisfaction with in-hospital acute stroke care is part of a more extensive complex comprising poor functional outcome, depressive mood, poor self-perceived general health, and dissatisfaction not only with acute care but also with health care and social services at large. Several aspects of stroke care organization are associated with a lower risk of dissatisfaction.


Key words: acute stroke care • patient satisfaction • stroke outcome • stroke services