Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on November 5, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print November 5, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.562041
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/12/e683    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.562041v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Touzé, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mas, J.-L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Touzé, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mas, J.-L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Angioplasty and Stenting

Submitted on July 8, 2009
Revised on August 25, 2009
Accepted on September 4, 2009

Systematic Review of the Perioperative Risks of Stroke or Death After Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting

Emmanuel Touzé PhD*; Ludovic Trinquart MSc; Gilles Chatellier PhD; and Jean-Louis Mas MD

From the Université Paris Descartes, INSERM U894 (E.T., J.-L.M.), Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Service de Neurologie, and INSERM CIE4 (L.T., G.C.), Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Unité de recherche clinique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.touze{at}ch-sainte-anne.fr.

Background and Purpose—Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) has not been shown to be as safe as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with regard to the risks of periprocedural complications, but beyond the perioperative period, the risks are comparable, suggesting that CAS may be an acceptable option in selected patients. However, risk factors for perioperative stroke and death have not been clearly established. We aimed to estimate the 30-day absolute risks of stroke or death after CAS and investigate sources of heterogeneity.

Methods—We sought articles published between January 1990 and June 2008 by using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the COCHRANE databases, hand-searching, abstract books from conferences, and official websites. Two reviewers independently and in duplicate selected articles on the risks of CAS, irrespective of the type of treatment, study design, setting, or language. The 2 reviewers abstracted data and assessed the quality of the studies.

Results—Two hundred six independent studies (with 54 713 patients) were included. The overall 30-day risk of stroke or death was 4.7% (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.2) with substantial heterogeneity across studies. Symptomatic patients were about twice as likely as those with asymptomatic stenoses to have complications. The 30-day risk of stroke or death was 7.6% (3.6 to 9.1) in symptomatic and 3.3% (2.6 to 4.1) in asymptomatic patients. Risks increased with age, hypertension, and history of coronary artery disease; were unrelated to sex and the presence of contralateral carotid occlusion; and were lower in patients who had carotid restenosis after CEA and in those treated with the use of a cerebral protection device. Risks have also decreased over time.

Conclusions—Risks of CAS vary substantially across studies. Risks are overall higher than those of CEA in symptomatic patients. Some factors are likely to help select good candidates for CAS.


Key words: stroke • carotid disease • stenting • angioplasty • atherosclerosis • systematic review