Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 29, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print October 29, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.570051
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/12/3879    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.570051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, L. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, L. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical

Submitted on October 7, 2009
Accepted on October 7, 2009

The 2009 Feinberg Lecture. The Continuum of Stroke Research and Policy

Larry B. Goldstein MD, FAAN, FAHA*

From the Department of Medicine (Neurology), Duke Stroke Center, Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University and Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: golds004{at}mc.duke.edu.

Background and Purpose—This annual Feinberg Award lecture is intended to present examples of the broad scope of stroke-related research and to show how different investigative approaches can advance the field to improve stroke patient's outcomes. In keeping with one of the objectives of the American Heart/American Stroke Association, this lecture also provides a perspective and highlights opportunities for beginning clinical investigators.

Summary of Report—Clinically, the continuum of stroke research and care can be divided into primary prevention, acute interventions, secondary prevention, and poststroke recovery. From a technical/methodological standpoint, fundamental laboratory studies yield insights into basic disease mechanisms and applied laboratory studies further explore the biological basis of disease and evaluate possible therapeutic interventions. The results of these laboratory-based observations can inform clinical study design whereas questions raised by clinical observations can be explored in laboratory experiments (ie, "translational" research). Additional information is gained through observational, interventional, and synthetic (eg, meta-analytic) clinical studies. Outcomes/effectiveness research determines how well interventions perform in different "real-world" settings. The discussion provides examples of how several of these approaches can be used to address various research questions. The importance for stroke investigators to contribute to related public policy issues is also reviewed.

Conclusions—This is an exciting era for clinical investigators studying stroke and for those at the beginning stages of their careers. Whether taking a broad-based research approach or working on a specific, focused question, our combined efforts are leading to improved outcomes for patients with stroke, the very goal of Bill Feinberg's career.


Key words: public policy • recovery • rehabilitation • stroke