This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tatlisumak, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tatlisumak, T. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information CT Scans MRI Scans Stroke

(Stroke. 2002;33:2144.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorials

Is CT or MRI the Method of Choice for Imaging Patients With Acute Stroke? Why Should Men Divide if Fate Has United?

Turgut Tatlisumak, MD, PhD

From the Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Correspondence to Turgut Tatlisumak, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail turgut.tatlisumak@hus.fi

Key Words: computed tomography • magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted • stroke, ischemic

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

In the hyperacute phase of ischemic stroke, CT images are often normal or show subtle changes only. On the contrary, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) can reveal the ischemic lesion in its full extent within minutes only in experimental studies¹ and as soon as a patient is available for imaging in clinical studies.² As new therapeutic options for ischemic stroke have appeared^3–5 and more of them are under way, having proper (and positive) imaging methods has become an essential issue. Even though most stroke physicians and neuroradiologists have recognized for years the superiority of DWI over CT in patients with acute focal neurological deficits, the work of Fiebach et al⁶ published in this issue of Stroke is the first to demonstrate this fact unbiasedly in a representative patient population. This work, coming from a dedicated stroke center, is an important addition to the accumulating evidence on the selection of imaging technique in hyperacute stroke.

Patients presenting with a sudden, focal neurological deficit do not always suffer an ischemic stroke. Approximately 5% of these patients will harbor other diseases (tumors, postictal paresis, multiple sclerosis, hemiplegic migraine, transient ischemic attacks, malingering, or even hypoglycemia or liver disease) where MRI is usually far more informative than CT. Another 10% of these patients will have intracerebral hemorrhage that can easily be detected either by CT or by T2*-weighted MRI.^7,8 High sensitivity and the high predictive value of MRI to ischemia help to avoid unnecessary and potentially dangerous therapeutic interventions and ensure that effective therapies will not . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. W. Youn, J. H. Kim, Y.-C. Weon, S. H. Kim, M.-K. Han, and H.-J. Bae Perfusion CT of the Brain Using 40-mm-Wide Detector and Toggling Table Technique for Initial Imaging of Acute Stroke Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): W120 - W126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Mullins, M. H. Lev, D. Schellingerhout, R. G. Gonzalez, and P. W. Schaefer Intracranial Hemorrhage Complicating Acute Stroke: How Common Is Hemorrhagic Stroke on Initial Head CT Scan and How Often Is Initial Clinical Diagnosis of Acute Stroke Eventually Confirmed? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2207 - 2212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Harbison, G. J. Gibson, D. Birchall, I. Zammit-Maempel, and G. A. Ford White matter disease and sleep-disordered breathing after acute stroke Neurology, October 14, 2003; 61(7): 959 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Kay and A C F Hui Visible infarction on CT after stroke--what does it tell? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2003; 74(4): 413 - 413. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Lev, W. J. Koroshetz, L. H. Schwamm, R. G. Gonzalez, and T. Tatlisumak CT or MRI for Imaging Patients with Acute Stroke: Visualization of "Tissue at Risk"? Stroke, December 1, 2002; 33(12): 2736 - 2737. [Full Text] [PDF]